Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 10;376(1824):20200196.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0196. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

Persuasive conversation as a new form of communication in Homo sapiens

Affiliations

Persuasive conversation as a new form of communication in Homo sapiens

Francesco Ferretti et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

The aim of this paper is twofold: to propose that conversation is the distinctive feature of Homo sapiens' communication; and to show that the emergence of modern language is tied to the transition from pantomime to verbal and grammatically complex forms of narrative. It is suggested that (animal and human) communication is a form of persuasion and that storytelling was the best tool developed by humans to convince others. In the early stage of communication, archaic hominins used forms of pantomimic storytelling to persuade others. Although pantomime is a powerful tool for persuasive communication, it is proposed that it is not an effective tool for persuasive conversation: conversation is characterized by a form of reciprocal persuasion among peers; instead, pantomime has a mainly asymmetrical character. The selective pressure towards persuasive reciprocity of the conversational level is the evolutionary reason that allowed the transition from pantomime to grammatically complex codes in H. sapiens, which favoured the evolution of speech. This article is part of the theme issue 'Reconstructing prehistoric languages'.

Keywords: animal communication; narrative; origin of grammar; pantomime; persuasion; pragmatics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University Illinois Press.
    1. Hauser MD. 1996. The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    1. Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL. 1998. Principles of animal communication. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
    1. Greenfield MD. 2002. Signalers and receivers: mechanisms and evolution of arthropod communication. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    1. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Bergman T, Fischer J, Zuberbühler K, Hammerschmidt K. 2010. The central importance of information in studies of animal communication. Anim. Behav. 80, 3-8. (10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.04.012) - DOI

LinkOut - more resources