Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 10;376(1824):20200200.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0200. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

Constructing a protolanguage: reconstructing prehistoric languages in a usage-based construction grammar framework

Affiliations

Constructing a protolanguage: reconstructing prehistoric languages in a usage-based construction grammar framework

Stefan Hartmann et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Construction grammar is an approach to language that posits that units and structures in language can be exhaustively described as pairings between form and meaning. These pairings are called constructions and can have different degrees of abstraction, i.e. they span the entire range from very concrete (armadillo, avocado) to very abstract constructions such as the ditransitive construction (I gave her a book). This approach has been applied to a wide variety of different areas of research in linguistics, such as how new constructions emerge and change historically. It has also been applied to investigate the evolutionary emergence of modern fully fledged language, i.e. the question of how systems of constructions can arise out of prelinguistic communication. In this paper, we review the contribution of usage-based construction grammar approaches to language change and language evolution to the questions of (i) the structure and nature of prehistoric languages and (ii) how constructions in prehistoric languages emerged out of non-linguistic or protolinguistic communication. In particular, we discuss the possibilities of using constructions as the main unit of analysis both in reconstructing predecessors of existing languages (protolanguages) and in formulating theories of how a potential predecessor of human language in general (protolanguage) must have looked like. This article is part of the theme issue 'Reconstructing prehistoric languages'.

Keywords: construction grammar; linguistic reconstruction; protolanguage; syntactic reconstruction; usage-based linguistics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Iterative reconstruction of proto-constructions and proto-constructicons, based on Barðdal et al. [64]. Cxn, construction.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Reconstructing prehistoric languages.
    Benítez-Burraco A, Progovac L. Benítez-Burraco A, et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 May 10;376(1824):20200187. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0187. Epub 2021 Mar 22. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 33745317 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Tallerman M. 2012. Protolanguage. In The Oxford handbook of language evolution (eds Tallerman M, Gibson KR), pp. 479-491. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    1. Crowley T, Bowern C. 2010. An introduction to historical linguistics, 4th edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    1. Heine B, Kuteva T. 2007. The genesis of grammar: a reconstruction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    1. Bybee J. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Arbib MA. 2012. How the brain got language: the mirror systems hypothesis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources