The descriptive epidemiology of brand-specific gun ownership in the US: results from the 2019 National Lawful Use of Guns Survey
- PMID: 33745443
- PMCID: PMC7983377
- DOI: 10.1186/s40621-021-00305-1
The descriptive epidemiology of brand-specific gun ownership in the US: results from the 2019 National Lawful Use of Guns Survey
Abstract
Background: No previous study has identified the specific brands of guns owned by gun owners. This study aimed to: (1) ascertain and describe patterns of brand- and model-specific gun ownership among US gun owners; and (2) investigate the relationship between gun owners' brand and model preferences and their attitudes towards common firearm violence prevention policies.
Methods: Using a national, pre-recruited internet panel of US adults in 2019, we surveyed gun owners (N = 2086) to ascertain their opinions regarding firearm violence prevention policies and to assess the brands and models of guns that they owned.
Results: Brand-specific gun ownership was highly concentrated and was dominated by three pistol brands, two revolver brands, three rifle brands, and three shotgun brands. There was wide variation in policy attitudes among owners of different gun brands, but little variation across owners of different gun types (i.e., pistols, rifles, revolvers, shotguns). We were able to identify the specific gun models owned by 1218 (59.4%) of the gun owners. Based on the classification of these gun models into three types we categorized the gun ownership pattern of the sample as 33.4% recreational, 45.5% self-defense, and 21.1% tactical. There were marked differences in support for firearm-related policies among the three groups, with support generally highest among the Recreation group and lowest among the Tactical group.
Conclusion: We conclude that gun brands and models are strong predictors of a gun owner's attitudes regarding firearm-related policies. This information could help public health practitioners develop segment-specific communications that will appeal to each group in order to more effectively engage gun owners in firearm violence prevention.
Keywords: Firearm laws; Firearm violence; Firearms; Gun policy; Guns.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
The Meaning of Guns to Gun Owners in the U.S.: The 2019 National Lawful Use of Guns Survey.Am J Prev Med. 2020 Nov;59(5):678-685. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jul 28. Am J Prev Med. 2020. PMID: 32736912
-
Assessment of Reasons for Ownership and Attitudes About Policies Among Firearm Owners With and Without Children.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2142995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42995. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35029666 Free PMC article.
-
Gun owners' assessment of gun safety policy: their underlying principles and detailed opinions.Inj Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 17;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40621-023-00430-z. Inj Epidemiol. 2023. PMID: 37069676 Free PMC article.
-
A Common Ground Gun Violence Prevention Policy Package.Psychol Rep. 2025 Feb;128(1):334-349. doi: 10.1177/00332941241248602. Epub 2024 Apr 29. Psychol Rep. 2025. PMID: 38684128 Review.
-
Reporting on pediatric unintentional firearm injury--who's responsible.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Sep;79(3 Suppl 1):S2-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000676. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015. PMID: 26308117 Review.
Cited by
-
Experiences of violence in daily life among adults in California: a population-representative survey.Inj Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 3;9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40621-021-00367-1. Inj Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 34980276 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 9. Washington: American Association for Public Opinion Research; 2016.
-
- ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, & Explosives) Annual Firearms Manufacturing and Export Report, 2017. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice; 2020.
-
- Avery J, Keinan A. Consuming brands. In: Norton MI, Rucker DD, Lamberton C, editors. The Cambridge handbook of consumer psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. pp. 209–232.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources