Analytical performances of the point-of-care SIENNA™ COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein in nasopharyngeal swabs: A prospective evaluation during the COVID-19 second wave in France
- PMID: 33746093
- PMCID: PMC7970753
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.051
Analytical performances of the point-of-care SIENNA™ COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein in nasopharyngeal swabs: A prospective evaluation during the COVID-19 second wave in France
Abstract
Objectives: We herein assessed the analytical performances of the antigen-rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) SIENNA™ COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test Cassette (Nasopharyngeal Swab) (Salofa Oy, Salo, Finland), targeting the SARS-CoV-2 N nucleocapsid protein, for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, by reference to real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR).
Methods: Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from patients with COVID-19-like illness during the second epidemic wave in Paris, France, among which 100 and 50 were positive and negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, respectively.
Results: Overall, the Ag-RDT showed high sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 90.0%, 100.0%, 100.0% and 98.1%, respectively, as well as high or almost perfect agreement (93.3%), reliability assessed by Cohen's κ coefficient (0.86), and accuracy assessed by Youden's J index (90%) to detect SARS-CoV-2. The analytical performances of the Ag-RDT remained high in the event of significant viral excretion (i.e., N gene Ct values ≤33 by reference rtRT-PCR), while the sensitivity of the Ag-RDT dropped to 69.6% with low or very low viral shedding (Ct > 33).
Conclusions: The SIENNA™ Ag-RDT presents excellent analytical performances for viral loads ≤33 Ct, classically corresponding to situations of symptomatic COVID-19 and/or proven contagiousness.
Keywords: Antigen; COVID-19; France; Protein N; Rapid diagnostic test.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and the writing of the paper.
References
-
- Brukner I., Eintracht S., Papadakis A.I., Faucher D., Lamontagne B., Spatz A. Maximizing confidence in a negative result: quantitative sample adequacy control. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13:991–993. - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; Atlanta, GA: 2020. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): interim guidance for rapid antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/resources/antigen-tests-gu.... [Last access 25 February 2021]
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . US Department of Health and Human Services; Atlanta, GA: 2020. COVID-19: CDC guidance for expanded screening testing to reduce silent spread of SARS-CoV-2. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/open-america/expanded-scre.... [Last access 25 February 2021]
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous