Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 30;32(2):221-236.
doi: 10.1093/imaman/dpaa014. eCollection 2021 Apr.

Resource optimization for cancer pathways with aggregate diagnostic demand: a perishable inventory approach

Affiliations

Resource optimization for cancer pathways with aggregate diagnostic demand: a perishable inventory approach

Edilson F Arruda et al. IMA J Manag Math. .

Abstract

This work proposes a novel framework for planning the capacity of diagnostic tests in cancer pathways that considers the aggregate demand of referrals from multiple cancer specialties (sites). The framework includes an analytic tool that recursively assesses the overall daily demand for each diagnostic test and considers general distributions for both the incoming cancer referrals and the number of required specific tests for any given patient. By disaggregating the problem with respect to each diagnostic test, we are able to model the system as a perishable inventory problem that can be solved by means of generalized G/D/C queuing models, where the capacity [Formula: see text] is allowed to vary and can be seen as a random variable that is adjusted according to prescribed performance measures. The approach aims to provide public health and cancer services with recommendations to align capacity and demand for cancer diagnostic tests effectively and efficiently. Our case study illustrates the applicability of our methods on lung cancer referrals from UK's National Health Service.

Keywords: capacity planning; healthcare modelling; inventory control; queuing systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<sc>Fig.</sc> 1.
Fig. 1.. Incoming distribution of lung cancer suspicions.
<sc>Fig.</sc> 2.
Fig. 2.. Distribution of CT requests for lung cancer referrals.
<sc>Fig.</sc> 3.
Fig. 3.. Cumulative distribution of CT requests for lung cancer referrals.
<sc>Fig.</sc> 4.
Fig. 4.. Steady state probabilities for the number of pending tests.
<sc>Fig.</sc> 5.
Fig. 5.. Waiting time thresholds and probabilities.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ahmadi, E., Masel, D. T., Metcalf, A. Y. & Schuller, K. (2019) Inventory management of surgical supplies and sterile instruments in hospitals: a literature review. Health Syst., 8, 134–151. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alagoz, O., Ayer, T. & Erenay, F. S. (2011) Operations Research Models for Cancer Screening. American Cancer Society. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1–14.
    1. Arruda, E. F., Pereira, B. B., Thiers, C. A. & Tura, B. R. (2019) Optimal testing policies for diagnosing patients with intermediary probability of disease. Artif. Intell. Med., 97, 89–97. - PubMed
    1. Aspland, E., Gartner, D. & Harper, P. (2019) Clinical pathway modelling: a literature review. Health Syst., 1–23. DOI 10.1080/20476965.2019.1652547 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bidhandi, H. M., Patrick, J., Noghani, P. & Varshoei, P. (2019) Capacity planning for a network of community health services. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 275, 266–279.

LinkOut - more resources