Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 3:2021:5551199.
doi: 10.1155/2021/5551199. eCollection 2021.

Influences of Different Drop Height Training on Lower Extremity Kinematics and Stiffness during Repetitive Drop Jump

Affiliations

Influences of Different Drop Height Training on Lower Extremity Kinematics and Stiffness during Repetitive Drop Jump

I-Lin Wang et al. Appl Bionics Biomech. .

Abstract

Drop jump (DJ) is often used as a plyometric exercise to improve jumping performance. Training from improper drop heights and for improper durations lead to unfavorable biomechanical changes in the lower extremities when landing, which result in reduced training effects and even lower extremity injuries. Purpose. To study the effects of repeated DJ training at drop heights of 30 cm, 40 cm, and 50 cm (drop jump height (DJH) 30, DJH40, and DJH50) on lower extremity kinematics and kinetics. The 1st, 50th, 100th, 150th, and 200th DJs (DJ1, DJs50, DJs100, DJs150, and DJs200) were recorded by using a BTS motion capture system and force platform. The MATLAB software was used to compare the kinematic and stiffness data of DJ1, DJs50, DJs100, DJs150, and DJs200 with one-way ANOVA repeated measure. If there were significant differences, the LSD method was used for post hoc comparisons. Methods. Twenty healthy male Division III athlete volunteers were selected as subjects, and 200 drop jumps (DJs200) were performed from DJH30, DJH40, and DJH50. Results. The jumping height (JH), contact time (CT), and GRF increased with drop height, and the stiffness of the legs and ankle at DJH30 was higher than that at DJH40 and DJH50 (p < 0.05). Conclusion. Within DJs200, training at DJH50 yield the high impact easily leads to lower extremity injury; training at DJH30 can increase the stiffnesses of the legs and ankle joints, thus effectively utilizing the SSC benefits to store and release elastic energy, reducing the risk of lower extremity musculoskeletal injury. Therefore, coaches can choose different drop heights and training quantities for each person to better prevent lower extremity injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with regard to the contents of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Framework for the proposed methodology.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The jumping height, contact time, reaction strength index, the peak vertical GRF, and right and left leg GRF during drop jumps from three heights at DJ1, DJs50, DJs100, DJs150, and DJs200. Asterisk † indicates that a significant difference with DJH30; ‡ indicates that a significant difference with DJH40; § indicates that a significant difference with DJH50. p values <0.05 were considered to significantly differ.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The right leg, hip, knee, and ankle stiffness during drop jumps from three heights at DJ1, DJs50, DJs100, DJs150, and DJs200. Asterisk † indicates that a significant difference with DJH30; ‡ indicates that a significant difference with DJH40; § indicates that a significant difference with DJH50. p values <0.05 were considered to significantly differ.

References

    1. Walsh M., Arampatzis A., Schade F., Brüggemann G. P. The effect of drop jump starting height and contact time on power, work performed, and moment of force. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2004;18(3):561–566. doi: 10.1519/1533-4287(2004)18<561:TEODJS>2.0.CO;2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Matavulj D., Kukolj M., Ugarkovic D., Tihanyi J., Jaric S. Effects of pylometric training on jumping performance in junior basketball players. Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness. 2001;41(2):159–164. - PubMed
    1. Simpson K. J., Kanter L. Jump distance of dance landings influencing internal joint forces: I. Axial forces. Medicine and science in sports and Exercise. 1997;29(7):916–927. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199707000-00011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mrdakovic V., Ilic D. B., Jankovic N., Rajkovic Z., Stefanovic D. Pre-activity modulation of lower extremity muscles within different types and heights of deep jump. Journal of sports science and medicine. 2008;7(2):p. 269. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peng H.-T., Kernozek T. W., Song C. Y. Quadricep and hamstring activation during drop jumps with changes in drop height. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2011;12(3):127–132. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2010.10.001. - DOI - PubMed