Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 5:8:480706.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.480706. eCollection 2021.

Leveraging Oral Drug Development to a Next Level: Impact of the IMI-Funded OrBiTo Project on Patient Healthcare

Affiliations
Review

Leveraging Oral Drug Development to a Next Level: Impact of the IMI-Funded OrBiTo Project on Patient Healthcare

Bart Hens et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

A thorough understanding of the behavior of drug formulations in the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract is essential when working in the field of oral drug development in a pharmaceutical company. For orally administered drug products, various GI processes, including disintegration of the drug formulation, drugrelease, dissolution, precipitation, degradation, dosage form transit and permeation, dictate absorption into the systemic circulation. These processes are not always fully captured in predictive in vitro and in silico tools, as commonly applied in the pre-clinical stage of formulation drug development. A collaborative initiative focused on the science of oral biopharmaceutics was established in 2012 between academic institutions and industrial companies to innovate, optimize and validate these in vitro and in silico biopharmaceutical tools. From that perspective, the predictive power of these models can be revised and, if necessary, optimized to improve the accuracy toward predictions of the in vivo performance of orally administered drug products in patients. The IMI/EFPIA-funded "Oral Bioavailability Tools (OrBiTo)" project aimed to improve our fundamental understanding of the GI absorption process. The gathered information was integrated into the development of new (or already existing) laboratory tests and computer-based methods in order to deliver more accurate predictions of drug product behavior in a real-life setting. These methods were validated with the use of industrial data. Crucially, the ultimate goal of the project was to set up a scientific framework (i.e., decision trees) to guide the use of these new tools in drug development. The project aimed to facilitate and accelerate the formulation development process and to significantly reduce the need for animal experiments in this area as well as for human clinical studies in the future. With respect to the positive outcome for patients, high-quality oral medicines will be developed where the required dose is well-calculated and consistently provides an optimal clinical effect. In a first step, this manuscript summarizes the setup of the project and how data were collected across the different work packages. In a second step, case studies of how this project contributed to improved knowledge of oral drug delivery which can be used to develop improved products for patients will be illustrated.

Keywords: EFPIA; IMI; oral absorption; oral biopharmaceutical tools; oral formulations; patient health care; pharmacokinetic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

BH and MM are employed by Pfizer UK. BA is employed by AstraZeneca. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A graphical illustration of the organization of the different work packages (WP) and how they are closely linked to each other.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Data obtained from WP 1 and 2 were used as an input for the in silico computational tools as described in WP 4 to predict the systemic exposure of the drug. Observed systemic data were obtained from data collected from WP 3.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic representation of BioGIT. F1 and F2 are the incoming flow rates and F is the outgoing flow rate; F = F1 + F2. Figure adopted from Kourentas et al. with permission. Copyright Elsevier 2016 (13).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abrahamsson B, McAllister M, Augustijns P, Zane P, Butler J, Holm R, et al. . Six years of progress in the oral biopharmaceutics area—A summary from the IMI OrBiTo project. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. (2020) 152:236–47. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.05.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kostewicz ES, Aarons L, Bergstrand M, Bolger MB, Galetin A, Hatley O, et al. . PBPK models for the prediction of in vivo performance of oral dosage forms. Eur J Pharm Sci. (2014) 57:300–21. 10.1016/j.ejps.2013.09.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kostewicz ES, Abrahamsson B, Brewster M, Brouwers J, Butler J, Carlert S, et al. . In vitro models for the prediction of in vivo performance of oral dosage forms. Eur J Pharm Sci. (2014) 57:342–66. 10.1016/j.ejps.2013.08.024 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bergström CAS, Holm R, Jørgensen SA, Andersson SBE, Artursson P, Beato S, et al. . Early pharmaceutical profiling to predict oral drug absorption: current status and unmet needs. Eur J Pharm Sci. (2014) 57:173–99. 10.1016/j.ejps.2013.10.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nyholm D, Askmark H, Gomes-Trolin C, Knutson T, Lennernäs H, Nyström C, et al. . Optimizing levodopa pharmacokinetics: intestinal infusion versus oral sustained-release tablets. Clin Neuropharmacol. (2003) 26:156–63. 10.1097/00002826-200305000-00010 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources