Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 17;7(1):e12125.
doi: 10.1002/trc2.12125. eCollection 2021.

Association of CSF Alzheimer's disease biomarkers with postoperative delirium in older adults

Affiliations

Association of CSF Alzheimer's disease biomarkers with postoperative delirium in older adults

Tamara G Fong et al. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). .

Abstract

Introduction: The interaction between delirium and dementia is complex. We examined if Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers in patients without clinical dementia are associated with increased risk of postoperative delirium, and whether AD biomarkers demonstrate a graded association with delirium severity.

Methods: Participants (n = 59) were free of clinical dementia, age 70 years, and scheduled for elective total knee or hip arthroplasties. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was collected at the time of induction for spinal anesthesia. CSF AD biomarkers were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (ADX/Euroimmun); cut points for amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration (ATN) biomarker status were A = amyloid beta (Aβ)42 <175 pg/mL or Aβ42/40 ratio <0.07; T = p-tau >80 pg/mL; and N = t-tau >700 pg/mL. Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and CAM-Severity (CAM-S) were rated daily post-operatively for delirium and delirium severity, respectively.

Results: 42, tau, and p-tau mean pg/mL (SD) were 361.5 (326.1), 618.3 (237.1), and 97.1 (66.1), respectively, for those with delirium, and 550.4 (291.6), 518.3 (213.5), and 54.6 (34.5), respectively, for those without delirium. Thirteen participants (22%) were ATN positive. Delirium severity by peak CAM-S [mean difference (95% confidence interval)] was 1.48 points higher (0.29-2.67), P = 0.02 among the ATN positive. Delirium in the ATN-positive group trended toward but did not reach statistical significance (23% vs. 7%, p = 0.10). Peak CAM-S [mean (SD)] in the delirium group was 7 (2.8) compared to no delirium group 2.5 (1.3), but when groups were further classified by ATN status, an incremental effect on delirium severity was observed, such that patients who were both ATN and delirium negative had the lowest mean (SD) peak CAM-S scores of 2.5 (1.3) points, whereas those who were ATN and delirium positive had CAM-S scores of 8.7 (2.3) points; other groups (either ATN or delirium positive) had intermediate CAM-S scores.

Discussion: The presence of AD biomarkers adds important information in predicting delirium severity. Future studies are needed to confirm this relationship and to better understand the role of AD biomarkers, even in pre-clinical phase, in delirium.

Keywords: AD biomarkers; delirium.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Plot of Peak CAM‐S Scores by ATN biomarker‐positive (ATN+) or biomarker‐negative (ATN−) and delirium presence (Del+) or absence (Del−). Peak CAM‐S, ranging from 0 to 19, with higher scores equaling greater delirium severity, is the highest single CAM‐S rating across all hospital days for each patient. Note that a minimum of three features is required for CAM delirium; therefore peak CAM‐S scores of 0 to 2 represent no (CAM‐defined) delirium; some patients without delirium received scores ≥2 based on non‐specific delirium features (eg, disorientation, memory impairment, psychomotor agitation), which can be present in conditions unrelated to delirium. Black line indicates median score. Red = ATN−, Del− (n = 43); Green = ATN−, Del+ (n = 10); Blue = ATN+, Del− (n = 3); Purple = ATN+, Del+ (n = 3). ATN = amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration; CAM‐S = Confusion Assessment Method–Severity

References

    1. Gleason L, Schmitt EM, Kosar CM, et al. Effect of delirium and other major complications on outcomes after elective surgery in older adults. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:1134‐1140. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inouye SK, Westendorp RG, Saczynski JS. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet. 2014;383:911‐922. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marcantonio ER. Delirium in hospitalized older adults. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1456‐1466. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fick DM, Agostini JV, Inouye SK. Delirium superimposed on dementia: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:1723‐1732. - PubMed
    1. Fong TG, Jones RN, Marcantonio ER, et al. Adverse outcomes after hospitalization and delirium in persons with Alzheimer disease. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:848‐856, W296. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources