Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 12;7(3):e06389.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06389. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Trait preference trade-offs among maize farmers in western Kenya

Paswel P Marenya  1 , Rosina Wanyama  2 , Solomon Alemu  3 , Vincent Woyengo  4
Affiliations

Trait preference trade-offs among maize farmers in western Kenya

Paswel P Marenya et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

Farmers inevitably make trade-offs when choosing which crop varieties to grow based on each variety's unique strengths (and weaknesses). This study uses choice experiment data from 1288 maize farmers from western Kenya and applies a mixed logit model to estimate willingness to sacrifice yield as an experimental devise to measure such trade-offs when farmers are called upon to chose varieties with varying levels of desirable agronomic or consumption traits. We find that men and women respondents had similar preferences for maize traits, but differed in the rate of tradeoffs between traits. Women respondents appeared to make larger yield sacrifices for tolerance to drought, Striga weed and good storability than men. Men showed higher willingness to sacrifice yield for closed tip. Implications for gender-sensitive maize breeding and seed market development are drawn.

Keywords: Choice experiment; Maize; Mixed logit; Trait preference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Abate T., Mugo S., De Groote H., Regassa M.W. DT maize. Q. Bull. Drought Toler. Maize Afr. Proj. 2015;4(3)
    1. Adamowicz W., Boxall P., Williams M., Louviere J. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1998;80(1):64–75.
    1. Alderman H., Chiappori A., Haddad L., Hoddinott J., Kanbur R. Unitary versus collective models of the household: is it time to shift the burden of proof? World Bank Res. Obs. 1995;10:1–19.
    1. Asrat S., Yesuf M., Carlsson F., Wale E. Farmers’ preferences for crop variety traits: lessons for on-farm conservation and technology adoption. Ecol. Econ. 2010;69(12):2394–2401.
    1. Becker G.M., DeGroot M.H., Marschak J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav. Sci. 1964;9(3):226–232. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources