Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;56(6):1114-1125.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13653. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

Outcomes reported in evaluations of programs designed to improve health in Indigenous people

Shingisai Chando  1   2 , Martin Howell  1   2 , Christian Young  3 , Jonathan C Craig  4 , Sandra J Eades  5 , Michelle Dickson  1 , Kirsten Howard  1
Affiliations

Outcomes reported in evaluations of programs designed to improve health in Indigenous people

Shingisai Chando et al. Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the outcomes reported and measured in evaluations of complex health interventions in Indigenous communities.

Data sources: We searched all publications indexed in MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, EconLit, and CINAHL until January 2020 and reference lists from included papers were hand-searched for additional articles.

Study design: Systematic review.

Data collection/extraction methods: We included all primary studies, published in peer-reviewed journals, where the main objective was to evaluate a complex health intervention developed specifically for an Indigenous community residing in a high-income country. Only studies published in English were included. Quantitative and qualitative data were extracted and summarized.

Principal findings: Of the 3523 publications retrieved, 62 evaluation studies were included from Australia, the United States, Canada, and New Zealand. Most studies involved less than 100 participants and were mainly adults. We identified outcomes across 13 domains: clinical, behavioral, process-related, economic, quality of life, knowledge/awareness, social, empowerment, access, environmental, attitude, trust, and community. Evaluations using quantitative methods primarily measured outcomes from the clinical and behavioral domains, while the outcomes reported in the qualitative studies were mostly from the process-related and empowerment domains.

Conclusion: The outcomes from qualitative evaluations, which better reflect the impact of the intervention on participant health, remain different from the outcomes routinely measured in quantitative evaluations. Measuring the outcomes from qualitative evaluations alongside outcomes from quantitative evaluations could result in more relevant evaluations to inform decision making in Indigenous health.

Keywords: Indigenous health; complex health interventions; evaluation; outcomes; policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Search results
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Outcomes measured in quantitative evaluations of Indigenous health interventions and the instruments used for measurement (n = 52)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Brewster DR, Morris PS. Indigenous child health: are we making progress? J Paediatr Child Health. 2015;51(1):40‐47. - PubMed
    1. Anderson I, Robson B, Connolly M, et al. Indigenous and tribal peoples' health (The Lancet‐Lowitja Institute Global Collaboration): a population study. The Lancet. 2016;388(10040):131‐157. - PubMed
    1. Scott PJ. Mixed methods: a paradigm for holistic evaluation of health IT. Ammenwerth E, Rigby M, eds. Evidence‐Based Health Informatics. 2016;102–113. - PubMed
    1. Springett J. Appropriate approaches to the evaluation of health promotion. Critical Public Health. 2001;11(2):139‐151.
    1. Jan S. A holistic approach to the economic evaluation of health programs using institutionalist methodology. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(10):1565‐1572. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources