Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;21(5):1413-1415.
doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13390. Epub 2021 Apr 5.

Tracing evolutionary history and admixture in mixed-ploidy systems

Affiliations

Tracing evolutionary history and admixture in mixed-ploidy systems

Filip Kolář. Mol Ecol Resour. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Polyploidy, resulting from whole genome duplication, is a widespread phenomenon throughout Eukaryotic kingdoms. It is estimated that 15% of speciation events in plants is due to polyploidization and 16% of plant species encompass ploidy variation. In spite of the evolutionary and economic significance of polyploidy, there is a limited set of tools that would allow routine population genetic and genomic analysis of polyploid systems, in particular for the inference of population diversity and differentiation from large genome-wide data sets (Dufresne et al., 2014; Meirmans, 2020). Such a shortage is striking especially when compared to the rapid development of such tools in diploid systems over the last decade. Consequently, population genomic research in polyploids is still lagging behind diploids, especially in autopolyploids, for example, polyploids with multiple (>2) similar genome copies. In this issue of Molecular Ecology Resources, Shastry et al. (2021) develops the first software specifically designed to infer population structure and ancestry in large genome-wide mixed-ploidy data sets, opening novel opportunities for polyploid population genomic analysis.

Keywords: hybridization; polyploidy; speciation; whole genome duplication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J., & Lange, K. (2009). Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Research, 19, 1655-1664. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.094052.109
    1. Blischak, P. D., Kubatko, L. S., & Wolfe, A. D. (2018). SNP genotyping and parameter estimation in polyploids using low-coverage sequencing data. Bioinformatics, 34, 407-415. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx587
    1. Dufresne, F., Stift, M., Vergilino, R., & Mable, B. K. (2014). Recent progress and challenges in population genetics of polyploid organisms: An overview of current state-of-the-art molecular and statistical tools. Molecular Ecology, 23, 40-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12581
    1. Gerard, D., Ferrão, L. F. V., Garcia, A. A. F., & Stephens, M. (2018). Genotyping polyploids from messy sequencing data. Genetics, 210, 789-807. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.118.301468
    1. Kolář, F., Čertner, M., Suda, J., Schönswetter, P., & Husband, B. C. (2017). Mixed-ploidy species: Progress and opportunities in polyploid research. Trends in Plant Science, 22, 1041-1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.011

LinkOut - more resources