Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;37(3):390-397.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Mar 6.

Examining Relationships Between GRBAS Ratings and Acoustic, Aerodynamic and Patient-Reported Voice Measures in Adults With Voice Disorders

Robert Brinton Fujiki  1 , Susan L Thibeault  2
Affiliations

Examining Relationships Between GRBAS Ratings and Acoustic, Aerodynamic and Patient-Reported Voice Measures in Adults With Voice Disorders

Robert Brinton Fujiki et al. J Voice. 2023 May.

Abstract

Objective: To determine if auditory-perceptual voice ratings performed using the GRBAS scale correlate with acoustic and aerodynamic measures of voice. A secondary aim was to examine the relationship between GRBAS ratings and patient-reported quality of life scales.

Methods: GRBAS ratings, acoustic, aerodynamic and patient-reported quality of life ratings were collected from the University of Wisconsin Madison Voice and Swallow Outcomes Database for 508 adults with voice disorders. Acoustic measures included noise to harmonic ratio, jitter%, shimmer%, highest fundamental frequency (F0) of vocal range, lowest F0 of vocal range, maximum phonation time and dysphonia severity index. Aerodynamic measures included phonation threshold pressure, subglottal pressure, mean transglottal airflow and laryngeal airway resistance. Patient-reported quality of life measures included the Vocal Handicap Index (VHI) and Glottal Function Index (GFI).

Results: GRBAS ratings were significantly correlated with several acoustic and aerodynamic measures, VHI and GFI. The strongest significant correlations for acoustic measures were observed between GRBAS ratings of overall voice quality and perturbation measures (jitter% r = 0.58, shimmer% r = 0.45, noise to harmonic ratio r = 0.36, Dysphonia Severity Index r = -0.56). The strongest significant correlation for aerodynamic voice measures was observed between GRBAS ratings of breathiness and transglottal airflow (r = 0.23), subglottal pressure (r = 0.49), and phonation threshold pressure (r = 0.26). GRBAS ratings were also significantly correlated with both VHI and the GFI scales. R values were higher for the VHI, but remained largely in low range for both scales.

Conclusions: Although GRBAS ratings were significantly correlated with multiple objective voice and patient related quality of life ratings, r values were low. These findings support the need for multiple voice measures when performing voice evaluations as no single voice measure was highly correlated with voice quality as measured by the GRBAS scale.

Keywords: GRBAS–Auditory-perceptual voice assessment–Acoustic–Aerodynamic–Vocal Handicap Index.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Distribution of GRBAS Ratings of Overall Severity of Dysphonia for each Diagnostic Group
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Roy N et al. Evidence-based clinical voice assessment: a systematic review. American journal of speech-language pathology 22, 212–226 (2013). - PubMed
    1. Patel R et al. Recommended Protocols for Instrumental Assessment of Voice: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Expert Panel to Develop a Protocol for Instrumental Assessment of Vocal Function. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 27, (2018). - PubMed
    1. Mehta D & Hillman R Use of Aerodynamic Measures in Clinical Voice Assessment. Perspective on Voice and Voice Disorders 17, 14–18 (2007).
    1. Zajac D & Mayo R Aerodynamic and temporal aspects of velopharyngeal function in normal speakers. J Speech Hear Res 39, 1199–1207 (1996). - PubMed
    1. Rosenthal A, Lowell S & Colton R Aerodynamic and Acoustic Features of Vocal Effort. Journal Of Voice 28, 144–153 (2014). - PubMed