Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 22;193(4):204.
doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-08980-9.

A critical review on geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol in water: sources, effects, detection, and removal techniques

Affiliations
Review

A critical review on geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol in water: sources, effects, detection, and removal techniques

S Mustapha et al. Environ Monit Assess. .

Abstract

The exposure to geosmin (GSM) and 2-methylisoborneol (2-MIB) in water has caused a negative impact on product reputation and customer distrust. The occurrence of these compounds and their metabolites during drinking water treatment processes has caused different health challenges. Conventional treatment techniques such as coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and chlorination employed in removing these two commonest taste and odor compounds (GSM and 2-MIB) were found to be ineffective and inherent shortcomings. The removal of GSM and MIB were found to be effective using combination of activated carbon and ozonation; however, high treatment cost associated with ozonation technique and poor regeneration efficiency of activated carbon constitute serious setback to the combined system. Other shortcoming of the activated carbon adsorption and ozonation include low adsorption efficiency due to the presence of natural organic matter and humic acid. In light of this background, the review is focused on the sources, effects, environmental pathways, detection, and removal techniques of 2-MIB and GSM from aqueous media. Although advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) were found to be promising to remove the two compounds from water but accompanied with different challenges. Herein, to fill the knowledge gap analysis on these algal metabolites (GSM and 2-MIB), the integration of treatment processes vis-a-viz combination of one or more AOPs with other conventional methods are considered logical to remove these odorous compounds and hence could improve overall water quality.

Keywords: 2-Methylisoborneol; Advanced oxidation processes; Conventional treatment techniques; Geosmin; Water quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Agus, E., Lim, M. H., Zhang, L., & Sedlak, D. L. (2011). Odorous compounds in municipal wastewater effluent and potable water reuse systems. Environmental Science and Technology, 45, 9347–9355.
    1. Ahmed, M. B., Zhou, J. L., Ngo, H. H., & Guo, W. (2015). Adsorptive removal of antibiotics from water and wastewater: progress and challenges. Science of the Total Environment, 532, 112–126.
    1. Ando, N., Matsui, Y., Kurotobi, R., Nakano, Y., Matsushita, T., & Ohno, K. (2010). Comparison of natural organic matter adsorption capacities of super-powdered activated carbon and powdered activated carbon. Water Research, 44(14), 4127–4136.
    1. Andreadakis, A. D., Mamais, D., Gavalakis, E. A., Noutsopoulos, C., Kouris, N., & Nikitopoulos, G. (2010). Removal of taste and odour from potable water by ozone and powdered activated carbon (PAC). International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, 5(3–4), 392–409.
    1. Antoniou, M. G., Zhao, C., O’Shea, K. E., Zhang, G., Dionysiou, D. D., Zhao, H., Han, C., Nadagouda, M. N., Choi, H., Fotiou, T., Triantis, T. M., & Hiska, A. (2016). Photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants in water: process optimization and degradation pathways. Photocatalysis: Applications 1, 1–34.

LinkOut - more resources