The Risk of Muscular Events Among New Users of Hydrophilic and Lipophilic Statins: an Observational Cohort Study
- PMID: 33751411
- PMCID: PMC8390626
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06651-6
The Risk of Muscular Events Among New Users of Hydrophilic and Lipophilic Statins: an Observational Cohort Study
Abstract
Background: Statins are effective lipid-lowering drugs for the prevention of cardiovascular disease, but muscular adverse events can limit their use. Hydrophilic statins (pravastatin, rosuvastatin) may cause less muscular events than lipophilic statins (e.g. simvastatin, atorvastatin) due to lower passive diffusion into muscle cells.
Objective: To compare the risk of muscular events between statins at comparable lipid-lowering doses and to evaluate if hydrophilic statins are associated with a lower muscular risk than lipophilic statins.
Design/setting: Propensity score-matched cohort study using data from the United Kingdom-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD.
Patients: New statin users. Cohort 1: pravastatin 20-40 mg (hydrophilic) vs simvastatin 10-20 mg (lipophilic), cohort 2: rosuvastatin 5-40 mg (hydrophilic) vs atorvastatin 10-80 mg (lipophilic), and cohort 3: simvastatin 40-80 mg vs atorvastatin 10-20 mg.
Main measures: The outcome was a first record of a muscular event (myopathy, myalgia, myositis, rhabdomyolysis) during a maximum follow-up of 1 year.
Key results: The propensity score-matched cohorts consisted of 1) 9,703, 2) 7,032, and 3) 37,743 pairs of statin users. Comparing the risk of muscular events between low-intensity pravastatin vs low-intensity simvastatin yielded a HR of 0.86 (95% CI 0.64-1.16). In the comparison of moderate- to high-intensity rosuvastatin vs equivalent doses of atorvastatin, we observed a HR of 1.17 (95% CI 0.88-1.56). Moderate- to high-intensity simvastatin was associated with a HR of 1.33 (95% CI 1.16-1.53), when compared with atorvastatin at equivalent doses.
Limitations: We could not conduct other pairwise comparisons of statins due to small sample size. In the absence of a uniform definition on the comparability of statin doses, the applied dose ratios may not fully match with all literature sources.
Conclusions: Our results do not suggest a systematically lower risk of muscular events for hydrophilic statins when compared to lipophilic statins at comparable lipid-lowering doses.
Keywords: CPRD; adverse events; myalgia; myopathy; statin.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Alexandra M. Mueller, Evangelia Liakoni, and Stephan Krähenbühl report grants from Sanofi, during the conduct of the study. Cornelia Schneider, Theresa Burkard, Susan S. Jick, Christoph R. Meier, and Julia Spoendlin declare to have no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Comparative risk of lipophilic and hydrophilic statins on incident depression: A retrospective cohort study.J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:542-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.06.021. Epub 2018 Jun 15. J Affect Disord. 2018. PMID: 29936394
-
Comparison of statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and persistent physical disability in older adults.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Mar;78(3):467-476. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03239-1. Epub 2021 Oct 26. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 34698889 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of Switching From High-Efficacy Lipid-Lowering Therapies to Generic Simvastatin on LDL-C Levels and LDL-C Goal Attainment Among High-Risk Primary and Secondary Prevention Populations in the United Kingdom.Clin Ther. 2015 Apr 1;37(4):804-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.12.019. Epub 2015 Jan 24. Clin Ther. 2015. PMID: 25626487
-
Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants.Am Heart J. 2019 Apr;210:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.007. Epub 2019 Jan 10. Am Heart J. 2019. PMID: 30716508
-
A systematic review on pharmacokinetics, cardiovascular outcomes and safety profiles of statins in cirrhosis.BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar 16;21(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01704-w. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 33726685 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Epidemiology of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2023 Nov;19(11):695-712. doi: 10.1038/s41584-023-01033-0. Epub 2023 Oct 6. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2023. PMID: 37803078 Review.
-
Statin-related Muscle Toxicity: An Evidence-based Review.touchREV Endocrinol. 2022 Nov;18(2):89-95. doi: 10.17925/EE.2022.18.2.89. Epub 2022 Nov 21. touchREV Endocrinol. 2022. PMID: 36694885 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Statin use and longitudinal changes in quantitative MRI-based biomarkers of thigh muscle quality: data from Osteoarthritis Initiative.Skeletal Radiol. 2024 Apr;53(4):683-695. doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04473-7. Epub 2023 Oct 16. Skeletal Radiol. 2024. PMID: 37840051 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of cardiovascular drug-related adverse drug reactions consultations in UK primary care: A cross-sectional study.PLoS One. 2024 Jul 24;19(7):e0307237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307237. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39046945 Free PMC article.
-
Hydrophilic or Lipophilic Statins?Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 May 20;8:687585. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.687585. eCollection 2021. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021. PMID: 34095267 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Clinical guideline CG181 - Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg181. Published 2014. Accessed November 25, 2019.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical