Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1988 Jan;67(1):1-9.
doi: 10.3382/ps.0670001.

Fat deposition in a broiler sire strain. 3. Heritability of and genetic correlations among body weight, abdominal fat, and feed conversion

Affiliations
Free article

Fat deposition in a broiler sire strain. 3. Heritability of and genetic correlations among body weight, abdominal fat, and feed conversion

F R Leenstra et al. Poult Sci. 1988 Jan.
Free article

Abstract

Body weight, abdominal fat, and feed conversion were measured in ad libitum-fed pedigreed chickens of four lines selected from a broiler sire strain. Lines were selected for four generations for a low amount of abdominal fat (AF), a favorable feed conversion (FC), a high body weight after restricted feeding (GR), and a high body weight after ad libitum feeding (GL). A total of 2,400 pedigreed chickens from three hatches were reared by line in groups on litter and 864 chickens were tested for individual feed conversion in individual cages. The h2 from the sire component for the four lines combined were for body weight, .27 (litter) and .22 (cages); for weight of abdominal fat, .54 (litter) and .40 (cages); for percentage abdominal fat, .53 (litter) and .45 (cages); and for feed conversion, .44 (cages). Analysis within line and sex indicated that, in the relatively fat GR and GL lines, sex-linked inheritance could be involved for abdominal fat. In the leaner AF and FC lines this was not the case. Genetic correlations (sire estimate) for the four lines combined were, between body weight and weight of abdominal fat, .58 (litter) and .55 (cages); between body weight and percentage abdominal fat, .36 (litter) and .47 (cages); between body weight and feed conversion, .16 (cages); between weight of abdominal and feed conversion, .43 (cages); and between percentage abdominal fat and feed conversion, .44 (cages). Genetic correlations did not differ significantly between sexes, but in the AF and FC lines, the genetic correlation between body weight and abdominal fat was higher (AF: .80, FC: .76) than in the GR (.14) and GL (.68) lines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by