High-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation compared with a conventional approach: Outcomes and reconnection patterns
- PMID: 33751694
- DOI: 10.1111/jce.14989
High-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation compared with a conventional approach: Outcomes and reconnection patterns
Abstract
Background: The effectiveness, safety, and pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns of point-by-point high-power, short-duration (HPSD) ablation relative to conventional force-time integral (FTI)-guided strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are unknown.
Objectives: To compare 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia (AA), complication rates, procedural times, and PV reconnection patterns with HPSD AF AF ablation versus an FTI-guided low-power, long-duration (LPLD) strategy.
Methods: We compared consecutive patients undergoing a first ablation procedure for paroxysmal or persistent AF. The HPSD protocol utilized a power of 50 W and durations of 6-8 s posteriorly and 8-10 s anteriorly. The LPLD protocol was FTI-guided with a power of ≤25 W posteriorly (FTI ≥ 300g·s) and ≤35 W anteriorly (FTI ≥ 400g·s).
Results: In total, 214 patients were prospectively included (107 HPSD, 107 LPLD). Freedom from AA at 1 year was achieved in 79% in the HPSD group versus 73% in the LPLD group (p = .339; adjusted hazard ratio with HPSD, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-1.23; p < .004 for non-inferiority). Procedure duration was shorter in the HPSD group (229 ± 60 vs. 309 ± 77 min; p < .005). Patients undergoing repeat ablation had a higher propensity for reconnection at the right PV carina in the HPSD group compared with the LPLD group (14/30 = 46.7% vs. 7/34 = 20.6%; p = .035). There were no differences in complication rates.
Conclusion: HPSD AF ablation resulted in similar freedom from AAs at 1 year, shorter procedure times, and a similar safety profile when compared with an LPLD ablation strategy. Patients undergoing HPSD ablation required more applications at the right carina to achieve isolation, and had a significantly higher rate of right carinal reconnections at redo procedures.
Keywords: atrial fibrillation ablation; high-power short-duration ablation; pulmonary vein reconnection patterns.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Comment in
-
High power, short duration ablation: At least for the right pulmonary vein carina, maybe not so fast.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 May;32(5):1229-1231. doi: 10.1111/jce.15007. Epub 2021 Mar 29. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021. PMID: 33724624 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: executive summary. Europace. 2017;2018(20):157-208.
-
- Nery PB, Belliveau D, Nair GM, et al. Relationship between pulmonary vein reconnection and atrial fibrillation recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;2:474-483.
-
- Squara F, Latcu DG, Massaad Y, Mahjoub M, Bun S-S, Saoudi N. Contact force and force-time integral in atrial radiofrequency ablation predict transmurality of lesions. Europace. 2014;16:660-667.
-
- Conti S, Weerasooriya R, Novak P, et al. Contact force sensing for ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized, multicenter trial. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:201-208.
-
- Yamashita K, Kamali R, Kwan E, MacLeod RS, Dosdall DJ, Ranjan R. Effective ablation settings that predict chronic scar after left atrial ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6:143-152.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
