Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;14(3):383-394.
doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12586. Epub 2021 May 5.

Evaluation of muscle strength following peripheral nerve surgery: A scoping review

Meghan K McGillivray  1 , Chloe Haldane  2 , Christopher Doherty  3 , Michael J Berger  4   5   6
Affiliations

Evaluation of muscle strength following peripheral nerve surgery: A scoping review

Meghan K McGillivray et al. PM R. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) can result in devastating loss of function, often with poor long-term prognosis. Increased use of peripheral nerve surgical techniques (eg, nerve transfer, nerve grafting, and nerve repair) has resulted in improved muscle strength and other functional outcomes in patients with PNI. Muscle strength has largely been evaluated with the British Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. MRC is convenient to use in clinical settings, but more robust measures of muscle function are necessary to fully elucidate patient recovery. This scoping review aims to examine alternative instruments used to assess muscle function in studies of peripheral nerve surgery for PNI of the upper and lower limbs. A scoping review was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PubMed databases in May and December of 2020, yielding a total of 20 studies pertaining to the review question. Studies pertaining to handheld dynamometry, grip and pinch dynamometry, Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometers, isokinetic dynamometry, ultrasonography, and electromyography were reviewed. We provide a synopsis of each method and current clinical applications and discuss potential benefits, disadvantages, and areas of future research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Fonseca MCR, Elui VMC, Lalone E, et al. Functional, motor, and sensory assessment instruments upon nerve repair in adult hands: systematic review of psychometric properties. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0836-0.
    1. Bruyns CN, Jacquet JB, Schreuders TA, Kalmijn S, Kuypers PD, Hovius SE. Predictors for return to work in patients with median and ulnar nerve injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28(1):28-34. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2003.50026.
    1. Tung TH, MacKinnon SE. Nerve transfers: indications, techniques, and outcomes. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(2):332-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.12.002.
    1. Grinsell D, Keating CP. Peripheral nerve reconstruction after injury: a review of clinical and experimental therapies. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:698256-698213. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/698256.
    1. Dy CJ, Garg R, Lee SK, Tow P, Mancuso CA, Wolfe SW. A systematic review of outcomes reporting for brachial plexus reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(2):308-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.10.033.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources