Equitably Allocating Resources during Crises: Racial Differences in Mortality Prediction Models
- PMID: 33751910
- PMCID: PMC8759151
- DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202012-4383OC
Equitably Allocating Resources during Crises: Racial Differences in Mortality Prediction Models
Abstract
Rationale: Crisis standards of care (CSCs) guide critical care resource allocation during crises. Most recommend ranking patients on the basis of their expected in-hospital mortality using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, but it is unknown how SOFA or other acuity scores perform among patients of different races. Objectives: To test the prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score and version 2 of the Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Score (LAPS2) among Black and white patients. Methods: We included Black and white patients admitted for sepsis or acute respiratory failure at 27 hospitals. We calculated the discrimination and calibration for in-hospital mortality of SOFA, LAPS2, and modified versions of each, including categorical SOFA groups recommended in a popular CSC and a SOFA score without creatinine to reduce the influence of race. Measurements and Main Results: Of 113,158 patients, 27,644 (24.4%) identified as Black. The LAPS2 demonstrated higher discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.77) than the SOFA score (AUC, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.68-0.69). The LAPS2 was also better calibrated than the SOFA score, but both underestimated in-hospital mortality for white patients and overestimated in-hospital mortality for Black patients. Thus, in a simulation using observed mortality, 81.6% of Black patients were included in lower-priority CSC categories, and 9.4% of all Black patients were erroneously excluded from receiving the highest prioritization. The SOFA score without creatinine reduced racial miscalibration. Conclusions: Using SOFA in CSCs may lead to racial disparities in resource allocation. More equitable mortality prediction scores are needed.
Keywords: acute respiratory failure; critical care; disaster planning; sepsis; triage.
Figures
Comment in
-
Mortality Prediction Models: Another Barrier to Racial Equity in a Pandemic.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jul 15;204(2):120-121. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202103-0809ED. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021. PMID: 33945776 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Ranney ML, Griffeth V, Jha AK. Critical supply shortages: the need for ventilators and personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic. N Engl J Med . 2020;382:e41. - PubMed
-
- Committee on Guidance for Establishing Crisis Standards of Care for Use in Disaster Situations, Institute of Medicine. Crisis standards of care: a systems framework for catastrophic disaster response. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2012. - PubMed
-
- Emanuel EJ, Persad G, Upshur R, Thome B, Parker M, Glickman A, et al. Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of COVID-19. N Engl J Med . 2020;382:2049–2055. - PubMed
-
- White DB, Lo B. A framework for rationing ventilators and critical care beds during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA . 2020;323:1773–1774. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
