Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;16(1):1901468.
doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1901468.

How do users with comorbidity perceive participation in social services? A qualitative interview study

Amanda Jones  1 , Kari Jess  1 , Ulla-Karin Schön  1   2
Affiliations

How do users with comorbidity perceive participation in social services? A qualitative interview study

Amanda Jones et al. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to construct a theoretical framework that explains how users with comorbidity of substance use and mental illness/neuropsychiatric disorders portray user participation in social work encounters.Methods: To construct this framework a constructivist grounded theory approach was used with semi-structured qualitative interviews with 12 users.Results: The main concern of the participants was the low trust in the social services and perceiving that this lack of trust is mutual. Establishing mutual trust is a social process that cuts through the whole framework. In the framework, prerequisites for participation are explained. The prerequisites are users being motivated and having the willingness to stop using drugs and receiving support, making use of user and staff knowledge and decision-making abilities and accessing help and support.Conclusion: Unlike previous frameworks, the model describes participation as a social process and does not explain participation at different levels of power. The results suggest that staff need to be aware of low trust perceptions and work on establishing mutual trust. In addition, the staff need to see each user as an individual and consider how the user would prefer to be involved in decision-making.

Keywords: Participation; grounded theory; mental illness; substance use; user knowledge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no competing interest

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Illustration of prerequisites of user participation in social work encounters
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–10. 10.1080/01944366908977225 - DOI
    1. Askheim, O. P., Christensen, K., Fluge, S., & Guldvik, I. (2017). User participation in the Norwegian welfare context: An analysis of policy discourses. Journal of Social Policy, 46(3), 583–601. 10.1017/S0047279416000817 - DOI
    1. Bee, P., Price, O., Baker, J., & Lovell, K. (2015). Systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to service user-led care planning. British Journal of Psychiatry, 207(2), 104–114. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.114.152447 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beresford, P. (2002). User involvement in research and evaluation: liberation or regulation? Social Policy and Society, 1(2), 95–105. 10.1017/S1474746402000222 - DOI
    1. Beresford, P. (2003). User involvement in research: Exploring the challenges. NT Research, 8(1), 36–46. 10.1177/136140960300800106 - DOI