Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 22;19(1):47.
doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00729-w.

A rodent model of human dose-equivalent progestin-only implantable contraception

Affiliations

A rodent model of human dose-equivalent progestin-only implantable contraception

Heather C M Allaway et al. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. .

Abstract

Background: Long-acting, reversible contraceptives (LARC; progestin only) are an increasingly common hormonal contraceptive choice in reproductive aged women looking to suppress ovarian function and menstrual cyclicity. The overall objective was to develop and validate a rodent model of implanted etonogestrel (ENG) LARC, at body size equivalent doses to the average dose received by women during each of the first 3 years of ENG subdermal rod LARC use.

Methods: Intact, virgin, female Sprague-Dawley rats (16-wk-old) were randomized to 1 of 4 groups (n = 8/group) of ENG LARC (high-0.30μg/d, medium-0.17μg/d, low-0.09μg/d, placebo-0.00μg/d) via a slow-release pellet implanted subcutaneously. Animals were monitored for 21 days before and 29 days following pellet implantation using vaginal smears, ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), saphenous blood draws, food consumption, and body weights. Data were analyzed by chi-square, non-parametric, univariate, and repeated measures 2-way ANOVA.

Results: Prior to pellet implantation there was no difference in time spent in estrus cycle phases among the treatment groups (p > 0.30). Following pellet implantation there was a dose-dependent impact on the time spent in diestrus and estrus (p < 0.05), with the high dose group spending more days in diestrus and fewer days in estrus. Prior to pellet insertion there was not an association between treatment group and estrus cycle classification (p = 0.57) but following pellet implantation there was a dose-dependent association with cycle classification (p < 0.02). Measurements from the UBM (ovarian volume, follicle count, corpora lutea count) indicate an alteration of ovarian function following pellet implantation.

Conclusion: Assessment of estrus cyclicity indicated a dose-response relationship in the shift to a larger number of acyclic rats and longer in duration spent in the diestrus phase. Therefore, each dose in this model mimics some of the changes observed in the ovaries of women using ENG LARC and provides an opportunity for investigating the impacts on non-reproductive tissues in the future.

Keywords: Estrus cycle; Etonogestrel; Hormonal contraception; Long-acting reversible contraception; Ovarian function; Progestin; Ultrasound biomicroscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JI is an employee of Synergyne Imaging Technology, Inc. (Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada). RAP has equity and board positions in Synergyne Imaging Technology, Inc. (Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada). HCMA and SAB declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Images of ovarian follicles and corpora lutea in rats using ultrasound biomicroscopy. Legend: Arrows with black outline define the external boundary of the ovary; Arrow-heads indicate follicles; White arrows indicate corpora lutea
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Body weight (a) and food consumption (b) varied with time across the study. Legend: Arrow = day of pellet insertion, # = different from week 1, * = different from week 2, ^ = different from week 3, % = different from week 4, $ = different from week 5
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Proportion of time spent in a specific cycle phase prior to (a) or following pellet insertion (b). Legend: # = different from Placebo dose within cycle phase, * = different from Low dose within cycle phase
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Cycle type classifications (a-c), ultrasound biomicrocope measurements (d-k), and estradiol concentrations (l). Legend: Arrow = day of pellet insertion, lines with # = difference between days (all treatment groups combined), lines with * = difference between treatment groups within one day, lines with & = difference between study days within the placebo group, lines with $ = difference between study days within the low dose group, lines with ^ = difference between study days within the high dose group

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Daniels K, Abma JC. NCHS Data Brief, no 327. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2018. Current contraceptive status among women aged 15–49: United States, 2015–2017. NCHS data brief, no 327.
    1. Lohr PA, Lyus R, Prager S. Use of intrauterine devices in nulliparous women. Contraception. 2017;95(6):529–537. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.08.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ali M, Akin A, Bahamondes L, Brache V, Habib N, Landoulsi S, Hubacher D, women WHOsgoscif Extended use up to 5 years of the etonogestrel-releasing subdermal contraceptive implant: comparison to levonorgestrel-releasing subdermal implant. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(11):2491–2498. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew222. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davies GC, Feng LX, Newton JR, Van Beek A, Coelingh-Bennink HJ. Release characteristics, ovarian activity and menstrual bleeding pattern with a single contraceptive implant releasing 3-ketodesogestrel. Contraception. 1993;47(3):251–261. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90042-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nappi C, Bifulco G, Tommaselli GA, Gargano V, Di Carlo C. Hormonal contraception and bone metabolism: a systematic review. Contraception. 2012;86(6):606–621. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.04.009. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources