Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 22;19(1):39.
doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00575-2.

Size, composition and distribution of health workforce in India: why, and where to invest?

Affiliations

Size, composition and distribution of health workforce in India: why, and where to invest?

Anup Karan et al. Hum Resour Health. .

Abstract

Background: Investment in human resources for health not only strengthens the health system, but also generates employment and contributes to economic growth. India can gain from enhanced investment in health workforce in multiple ways. This study in addition to presenting updated estimates on size and composition of health workforce, identifies areas of investment in health workforce in India.

Methods: We analyzed two sources of data: (i) National Health Workforce Account (NHWA) 2018 and (ii) Periodic Labour Force Survey 2017-2018 of the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO). Using the two sources, we collated comparable estimates of different categories of health workers in India, density of health workforce and skill-mix at the all India and state levels.

Results: The study estimated (from NHWA 2018) a total stock of 5.76 million health workers which included allopathic doctors (1.16 million), nurses/midwives (2.34 million), pharmacist (1.20 million), dentists (0.27 million), and traditional medical practitioner (AYUSH 0.79 million). However, the active health workforce size estimated (NSSO 2017-2018) is much lower (3.12 million) with allopathic doctors and nurses/midwives estimated as 0.80 million and 1.40 million, respectively. Stock density of doctor and nurses/midwives are 8.8 and 17.7, respectively, per 10,000 persons as per NHWA. However, active health workers' density (estimated from NSSO) of doctor and nurses/midwives are estimated to be 6.1 and 10.6, respectively. The numbers further drop to 5.0 and 6.0, respectively, after accounting for the adequate qualifications. All these estimates are well below the WHO threshold of 44.5 doctor, nurses and midwives per 10,000 population. The results reflected highly skewed distribution of health workforce across states, rural-urban and public-private sectors. A substantial proportion of active health worker were found not adequately qualified on the one hand and on the other more than 20% of qualified health professionals are not active in labor markets.

Conclusion: India needs to invest in HRH for increasing the number of active health workers and also improve the skill-mix which requires investment in professional colleges and technical education. India also needs encouraging qualified health professionals to join the labor markets and additional trainings and skill building for already working but inadequately qualified health workers.

Keywords: Health workforce; Human resource for health; India; Investment in health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JB is Editor in Chief of the journal “Human Resources for Health” but blinded to the review process.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Number of health professionals/workers per 10,000 persons, 2018. Sources: estimates from NHWA 2018 and NSSO 2017–2018. Using population projection as of 1st January 2018 from Census of India 2019
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Density of health workers/professionals in states, 2018. Sources: estimates from NSSO 2017–2018. Using population projection as of 1st January 2018 from Census of India 2019
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
States with varied density of doctors and nurse/doctor ratio. DE Delhi, HA Haryana, HI Himachal Pradesh, JK Jammu and Kashmir, PU Punjab, RJ Rajasthan, UK Uttarakhand, AS Assam, CH Chhattisgarh, MP Madhya Pradesh, UP Uttar Pradesh, BI Bihar, JH Jharkhand, WB West Bengal, OD Odisha, MA Maharashtra, GU Gujarat, AP Andhra Pradesh, KA Karnataka, KE Kerala, TN Tamil Nadu, TE Telangana Source: estimates from NSSO 2017–2018 and Census of India 2019. Using population projection as of 1st January 2018 from Census of India 2019
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Gender distribution of HRH in India-2018. Source: estimates from NSSO 2017–2018
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Age distribution of health workforce in India-2018. Source: estimates from NSSO 2017–2018
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Percentage distribution of individuals with various levels of technical education in medicine as employed, unemployed and out of labor force, 2018. Source: estimates from NSSO 2017–2018

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO. The World Health Report–working together for health. Geneva, World Health Organization. 2006. https://www.who.int/whr/2006/whr06_en.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 20 Apr 2020.
    1. WHO. High-Level Commission on Health Employment and Economic Growth. Geneva, World Health Organization. 2016. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250040/9789241511285-en.... Accessed 20 Apr 2020.
    1. Scheil-Adlung X, Thorsten Behrendt T, Wong L. Health sector employment: a tracer indicator for universal health coverage in national social protection floors. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13:66. doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0056-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO. Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health: Workforce 2030. Geneva, World Health Organization. 2019. https://www.who.int/hrh/resources/global_strategy_workforce2030_14_print.... Accessed 20 Apr 2020.
    1. Cometto G, Campbell J. Investing in human resources for health: beyond health outcomes. Hum Resour Health. 2016;14:51. doi: 10.1186/s12960-016-0147-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources