Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 22;18(1):67.
doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01113-y.

Optimizing the design of a contraceptive microarray patch: a discrete choice experiment on women's preferences in India and Nigeria

Rebecca L Callahan  1 , Aurélie Brunie  2 , Victoria Lebrun  3 , Mario Chen  3 , Christine L Godwin  3 , Kanchan Lakhwani  4 , Funmilola M OlaOlorun  5
Affiliations

Optimizing the design of a contraceptive microarray patch: a discrete choice experiment on women's preferences in India and Nigeria

Rebecca L Callahan et al. Reprod Health. .

Abstract

Background: Efforts are underway to develop an easy-to-use contraceptive microarray patch (MAP) that could expand the range of self-administrable methods. This paper presents results from a discrete choice experiment (DCE) designed to support optimal product design.

Methods: We conducted a DCE survey of users and non-users of contraception in New Delhi, India (496 women) and Ibadan, Nigeria (two versions with 530 and 416 women, respectively) to assess stated preferences for up to six potential product attributes: effect on menstruation, duration of effectiveness, application pain, location, rash after application, and patch size. We estimated Hierarchical Bayes coefficients (utilities) for each attribute level and ran simulations comparing women's preferences for hypothetical MAPs with varying attribute combinations.

Results: The most important attributes of the MAP were potential for menstrual side effects (55% of preferences in India and 42% in Nigeria) and duration (13% of preferences in India and 24% in Nigeria). Women preferred a regular period over an irregular or no period, and a six-month duration to three or one month. Simulations show that the most ideal design would be a small patch, providing 6 months of protection, that would involve no pain on administration, result in a one-day rash, and be applied to the foot.

Conclusions: To the extent possible, MAP developers should consider method designs and formulations that limit menstrual side effects and provide more than one month of protection.

Keywords: Contraception; Discrete choice experiment; India; Microarray patch; Nigeria; User preferences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The study was implemented by FHI 360, which also provides grant funding to the MAP product developer, the Georgia Institute of Technology.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Attributes and levels included in the discrete choice experiment. *Version used in Nigeria included darker skin tone for pain and rash illustrations. One rupee coin used for the size illustration in the India survey and the soda top in the Nigeria survey
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Sample selection for the discrete choice experiment in India and Nigeria. *Determined to be not eligible after being reached for interview
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relative importance of MAP attributes, India (N = 496)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Relative importance of MAP attributes, Nigeria Sample 1 (N = 530)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Relative importance of MAP attributes, Nigeria Sample 2 (N = 416)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Simulations of change in preference with different hypothetical contraceptive MAP designs
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Wulifan JK, Brenner S, Jahn A, De Allegri M. A scoping review on determinants of unmet need for family planning among women of reproductive age in low and middle income countries. BMC Womens Health. 2016;16:2. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0281-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell M, Sahin-Hodoglugil NN, Potts M. Barriers to fertility regulation: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann. 2006;37(2):87–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2006.00088.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sedgh G, Hussain R. Reasons for contraceptive nonuse among women having unmet need for contraception in developing countries. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45(2):151–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00382.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nanda K, Callahan R, Dorflinger L. Addressing gaps in the contraceptive method mix: methods in development. Womens Health (Lond) 2015;11(6):729–735. doi: 10.2217/whe.15.84. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, Jordan K, Leslie HH, Roder-DeWan S, Adeyi O, Barker P, Daelmans B, Doubova SV, English M. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(11):e1196–e1252. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources