Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 22;18(1):53.
doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00834-2.

Virtual reality-based assessment of cognitive-locomotor interference in healthy young adults

Affiliations

Virtual reality-based assessment of cognitive-locomotor interference in healthy young adults

Anne Deblock-Bellamy et al. J Neuroeng Rehabil. .

Abstract

Background: A recent literature review emphasized the importance of assessing dual-task (DT) abilities with tasks that are representative of community ambulation. Assessing DT ability in real-life activities using standardized protocols remains difficult. Virtual reality (VR) may represent an interesting alternative enabling the exposure to different scenarios simulating community walking. To better understand dual-task abilities in everyday life activities, the aims of this study were (1) to assess locomotor and cognitive dual-task cost (DTC) during representative daily living activities, using VR, in healthy adults; and 2) to explore the influence of the nature and complexity of locomotor and cognitive tasks on DTC.

Methods: Fifteen healthy young adults (24.9 ± 2.7 years old, 8 women) were recruited to walk in a virtual 100 m shopping mall corridor, while remembering a 5-item list (DT condition), using an omnidirectional platform and a VR headset. Two levels of difficulty were proposed for the locomotor task (with vs. without virtual agent avoidance) and for the cognitive task (with vs. without items modification). These tasks were also performed in single task (ST) condition. Locomotor and cognitive DTC were measured by comparing performances in ST and DT conditions. Locomotor performance was characterized using walking speed, walking fluidity, and minimal distance between the participant and the virtual agent during avoidance. Cognitive performance was assessed with the number of items correctly recalled. Presence of DTC were determined with one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. To explore the influence of the tasks' complexity and nature on DTC, a nonparametric two-way repeated measure ANOVA was performed.

Results: No locomotor interference was measured for any of the outcomes. A cognitive DTC of 6.67% was measured (p = .017) while participants performed simultaneously both complex locomotor and cognitive tasks. A significant interaction between locomotor task complexity and cognitive task nature (p = .002) was identified on cognitive DTC.

Conclusions: In challenging locomotor and cognitive conditions, healthy young adults present DTC in cognitive accuracy, which was influenced by the locomotor task complexity task and the cognitive task nature. A similar VR-based protocol might be used to investigate DT abilities in older adults and individuals with a stroke.

Keywords: Cognition; Dual‐task cost; Healthy adults; Locomotion; Virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Experimental setup. a Omnidirectional platform (Virtualizer, Cyberith GmbH) and virtual reality headset (Vive, HTC); b virtual environment without virtual agent avoidance; c virtual environment with virtual agent avoidance; d description of the 8 experimental tasks
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Virtual agent trajectory. Once the non-visible target (white circle), located at 7 meters in front of the participant, was hit, the virtual agent (A) walked toward the participant (P)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Raffegeau TE, Haddad JM, Huber JE, Rietdyk S. Walking while talking: Young adults flexibly allocate resources between speech and gait. Gait Posture. 2018;64:59–62. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.05.029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sigman M, Dehaene S. Brain mechanisms of serial and parallel processing during dual-task performance. J Neurosci. 2008;28(30):7585–98. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0948-08.2008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yogev-Seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. The role of executive function and attention in gait. Movement Disord. 2008;23(3):329–42. doi: 10.1002/mds.21720. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture. 2002;16(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00156-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol Bull. 1994;116(2):220–44. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources