Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 22;16(1):207.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02303-x.

Systematic review of intervertebral disc repair: a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most-cited articles

Affiliations

Systematic review of intervertebral disc repair: a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most-cited articles

Gang Xu et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Study design: A bibliometric review of the literature.

Objective: To identify the most frequently cited articles relating to the repair of intervertebral disc (IVD) and to summarize the key points and findings of these highly cited works, to quantify their impact on the developments of the disc disease treatment. IVD repair is an ever-growing and multi-disciplinary innovating treatment method for disc diseases. There are numerous literatures and related studies about it, promoting the development of the field. A comprehensive review and analysis of the most influential articles can help clarify the most effective strategy of IVD repair, and discover the promising directions for future research.

Methods: The Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge was searched for citations of all literatures relevant to IVD repair. The number of citations, key points, categories, authorships, years, journals, countries, and institutions of publications were analyzed.

Results: The most highly cited articles in IVD Repair were published over 30 years, between 1991 and 2017. Most works (No. 41) were published between 2005 and 2009. The most-cited article was Sakai's 2003 article which described the possibility of combining MSC and gel to repair IVD. The three most popular categories involved were Orthopedics [44], Clinical Neurology [34], Engineering, and Biomedical [24]. The three most common topics were regenerative medicine and the progenitor cells [33], biomaterials and cellular scaffolds [29], application of growth factors [25]. Author Masuda and the partners have 4 articles in the top 100 list. The Rush University has 12 articles in the top 100 list.

Conclusion: This report identifies the top 100 articles in IVD repair and acknowledges those individuals who have contributed the most to the study of the IVD repair and the body of knowledge used to the repair strategy making. It allows insight into the trends of this innovative and interdisciplinary subspecialty of spine surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We warrant that our submission to the work is original, does not infringe upon, violate, or misappropriate any copyright or other intellectual property rights, or any other proprietary right, contract or other right or interest of any third party, and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this work nor a similar work has been published nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by this publication.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The 100 most-cited articles related to IVD repair distributed over 5-year intervals according to date of publication
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The nations of origin (according to address provided by the first author) for the 100 most-cited articles
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The top topics for the 100 most-cited articles pertaining to IVD repair

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Diebo BG, et al. Adult spinal deformity. Lancet. 2019;394:160–172. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31125-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Melrose J. Strategies in regenerative medicine for intervertebral disc repair using mesenchymal stem cells and bioscaffolds. Regen Med. 2016;11(7):705–724. doi: 10.2217/rme-2016-0069. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kelly JC, et al. The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume. 2010;92(10):1338–1343. - PubMed
    1. Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006;295(1):90–93. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.1.90. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ellegaard O, Wallin JA. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics. 2015;105(3):1809–1831. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances