Post-exposure prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 in close contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases (CORIPREV): study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial
- PMID: 33752741
- PMCID: PMC7982877
- DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05134-7
Post-exposure prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 in close contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases (CORIPREV): study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial
Abstract
Background: Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is a well-established strategy for the prevention of infectious diseases, in which recently exposed people take a short course of medication to prevent infection. The primary objective of the COVID-19 Ring-based Prevention Trial with lopinavir/ritonavir (CORIPREV-LR) is to evaluate the efficacy of a 14-day course of oral lopinavir/ritonavir as PEP against COVID-19 among individuals with a high-risk exposure to a confirmed case.
Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, 1:1 cluster-randomized trial of LPV/r 800/200 mg twice daily for 14 days (intervention arm) versus no intervention (control arm), using an adaptive approach to sample size calculation. Participants will be individuals aged > 6 months with a high-risk exposure to a confirmed COVID-19 case within the past 7 days. A combination of remote and in-person study visits at days 1, 7, 14, 35, and 90 includes comprehensive epidemiological, clinical, microbiologic, and serologic sampling. The primary outcome is microbiologically confirmed COVID-19 infection within 14 days after exposure, defined as a positive respiratory tract specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction. Secondary outcomes include safety, symptomatic COVID-19, seropositivity, hospitalization, respiratory failure requiring ventilator support, mortality, psychological impact, and health-related quality of life. Additional analyses will examine the impact of LPV/r on these outcomes in the subset of participants who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 at baseline. To detect a relative risk reduction of 40% with 80% power at α = 0.05, assuming the secondary attack rate in ring members (p0) = 15%, 5 contacts per case and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.05, we require 110 clusters per arm, or 220 clusters overall and approximately 1220 enrollees after accounting for 10% loss-to-follow-up. We will modify the sample size target after 60 clusters, based on preliminary estimates of p0, ICC, and cluster size and consider switching to an alternative drug after interim analyses and as new data emerges. The primary analysis will be a generalized linear mixed model with logit link to estimate the effect of LPV/r on the probability of infection. Participants who test positive at baseline will be excluded from the primary analysis but will be maintained for additional analyses to examine the impact of LPV/r on early treatment.
Discussion: Harnessing safe, existing drugs such as LPV/r as PEP could provide an important tool for control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Novel aspects of our design include the ring-based prevention approach, and the incorporation of remote strategies for conducting study visits and biospecimen collection.
Trial registration: This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04321174 ) on March 25, 2020.
Keywords: COVID-19; Chemoprophylaxis; Cluster randomization; Lopinavir/ritonavir; Post-exposure prophylaxis; Protocol; Randomized controlled trial.
Conflict of interest statement
DHST has received investigator-initiated research grants to his institution from Gilead and Viiv Healthcare. DHST is a Site Principal Investigator for clinical trials sponsored by Glaxo Smith Kline. PJ serves as an unpaid member of the steering group or executive committee of trials funded by Abbott Vascular, Astra Zeneca, Biotronik, Biosensors, St. Jude Medical, Terumo, and The Medicines Company, has received research grants to the institution from Appili Therapeutics, Astra Zeneca, Biotronik, Biosensors International, Eli Lilly, The Medicines Company, and honoraria to the institution for participation in advisory boards and/or consulting from Amgen, Ava, and Fresenius, but has not received personal payments by any pharmaceutical company or device manufacturer. SLW serves on advisory boards, speaks at continuing medical education events and conducts clinical trials through her institution with Gilead, Merck, Viiv Healthcare, and Jansen.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of pragmatic same-day ring prophylaxis for adult individuals exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in Switzerland (COPEP): protocol of an open-label cluster randomised trial.BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 12;10(11):e040110. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040110. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33184083 Free PMC article.
-
PROTECT Trial: A cluster-randomized study with hydroxychloroquine versus observational support for prevention or early-phase treatment of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2020 Jul 31;21(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04527-4. Trials. 2020. PMID: 32736597 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of hydroxychloroquine for post-exposure prophylaxis to prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among adults exposed to coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04446-4. Trials. 2020. PMID: 32493478 Free PMC article.
-
Comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of LPV/r drugs in the treatment of SARS and MERS to provide potential treatment options for COVID-19.Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Apr 20;13(8):10833-10852. doi: 10.18632/aging.202860. Epub 2021 Apr 20. Aging (Albany NY). 2021. PMID: 33879634 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review.Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2021 Jun;19(6):679-687. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2021.1848545. Epub 2020 Dec 21. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2021. PMID: 33187459
Cited by
-
Post-exposure Lopinavir-Ritonavir Prophylaxis versus Surveillance for Individuals Exposed to SARS-CoV-2: The COPEP Pragmatic Open-Label, Cluster Randomized Trial.EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Dec;42:101188. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101188. Epub 2021 Nov 6. EClinicalMedicine. 2021. PMID: 34778734 Free PMC article.
-
Mitoquinone mesylate as post-exposure prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: an exploratory single center pragmatic open label non-randomized pilot clinical trial with matched controls.EBioMedicine. 2024 Apr;102:105042. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105042. Epub 2024 Mar 11. EBioMedicine. 2024. PMID: 38471990 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Review of the Ring Trial Design for Evaluating Ring Interventions for Infectious Diseases.Epidemiol Rev. 2022 Dec 21;44(1):29-54. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxac003. Epidemiol Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593400 Free PMC article.
-
Motivations for enrollment in a COVID-19 ring-based post-exposure prophylaxis trial: qualitative examination of participant experiences.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02394-0. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024. PMID: 39501157 Free PMC article.
-
Oral Antiviral Treatment for COVID-19: A Comprehensive Review on Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir.Viruses. 2022 Nov 17;14(11):2540. doi: 10.3390/v14112540. Viruses. 2022. PMID: 36423149 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Livingston E, Bucher K. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Italy. JAMA. 2020;323(14):1335. 10.1001/jama.2020.4344. - PubMed
-
- WHO R&D Blueprint COVID-19. Informal consultation on the role of therapeutics in COVID-19 prophylaxis and post-exposure prophylaxis. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2020. 31st March 2020.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous