Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 22;10(1):82.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01630-8.

Why do some inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work when others do not? A realist review

Affiliations
Review

Why do some inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work when others do not? A realist review

Justin Avery Aunger et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Inter-organisational collaboration is increasingly prominent within contemporary healthcare systems. A range of collaboration types such as alliances, networks, and mergers have been proposed as a means to turnaround organisations, by reducing duplication of effort, enabling resource sharing, and promoting innovations. However, in practice, due to the complexity of the process, such efforts are often rife with difficulty. Notable contributions have sought to make sense of this area; however, further understanding is needed in order to gain a better understanding of why some inter-organisational collaborations work when others do not, to be able to more effectively implement collaborations in the future.

Methods: Realist review methodology was used with the intention of formulating context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) to explain how inter-organisational collaborations work and why, combining systematic and purposive literature search techniques. The systematic review encompassed searches for reviews, commentaries, opinion pieces, and case studies on HMIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Social Policy and Practice databases, and further searches were conducted using Google Scholar. Data were extracted from included studies according to relevance to the realist review.

Results: Fifty-three papers were included, informing the development of programme theories of how, why, and when inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work. Formulation of our programme theories incorporated the concepts of partnership synergy and collaborative inertia and found that it was essential to consider mechanisms underlying partnership functioning, such as building trust and faith in the collaboration to maximise synergy and thus collaborative performance. More integrative or mandated collaboration may lean more heavily on contract to drive collaborative behaviour.

Conclusion: As the first realist review of inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare as an intervention for improvement, this review provides actionable evidence for policymakers and implementers, enhancing understanding of mechanisms underlying the functioning and performing of inter-organisational collaborations, as well as how to configure the context to aid success. Next steps in this research will test the results against further case studies and primary data to produce a further refined theory.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42019149009.

Keywords: Collaboration; Context; Healthcare; Implementation; Improvement; Integration; Partnership working; Programme theory; Realist review; Realist synthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of paper selection from the systematic search
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Partnership synergy as an intermediate outcome. Adapted from Lasker et al. [66]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Programme theory—depiction of main mechanisms and outcomes at play
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The shift from trust to confidence as a determinant for collaborative behavior in mandated and more integrative forms of collaboration

References

    1. Dickinson H, Glasby J. “Why partnership working doesn’t work”: pitfalls, problems and possibilities in English health and social care. Public Manag Rev. 2010;12(6):811–828. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2010.488861. - DOI
    1. Elston JM. Oxford handbook of public health. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. Partnerships; pp. 526–538.
    1. Hudson B, Henwood M. The NHS and social care: the final countdown? Policy Polit. 2002;30(2):153–166. doi: 10.1332/0305573022501610. - DOI
    1. Auschra C. Barriers to the integration of care in inter-organisational settings: a literature review. Int J Integr Care. 2018;18(1):1–14. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3068. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hardy C, Phillips N, Lawrence TB. Resources, knowledge and influence: the organizational effects of inter-organizational collaboration. J Manag Stud. 2003;40(2):321–347. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00342. - DOI

Publication types