Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;76(6):472.e1-472.e9.
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.02.019. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

Simultaneous assessment of coronary flow reserve and left ventricular function during vasodilator stress evaluated by 13N-ammonia hybrid PET/MRI

Affiliations

Simultaneous assessment of coronary flow reserve and left ventricular function during vasodilator stress evaluated by 13N-ammonia hybrid PET/MRI

T Kiko et al. Clin Radiol. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Aim: To explore changes in left ventricular (LV) function and the relationship of these changes with myocardial blood flow (MBF) evaluated by 13N-ammonia hybrid positron-emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during vasodilator stress in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

Materials and methods: Fifty-two consecutive patients with suspected CAD, who underwent 13N-ammonia PET/MRI, were enrolled. Vasodilator stress was induced by intravenous injection of adenosine. MBF and coronary flow reserve (CFR) were calculated from dynamic acquisition of 13N-ammonia PET. LV function was evaluated by MRI both at rest and during vasodilator stress. An abnormal perfusion on myocardial images was defined as a summed difference score of ≥4.

Results: MRI showed that the LV end-diastolic volume, LV end-systolic volume, and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) remained unchanged during vasodilator stress in all patients (n=52) as well as in the patients with CFR of <2 (n=27), stress MBF of <1.3 ml/g/min (n=28), abnormal myocardial perfusion (n=30), and more than one diseased vessel (n=46). In only four patients, the LVEF measured by MRI decreased by >5% during vasodilator stress. In these four patients, CFR was lower (1.57 ± 0.12 versus 2.18 ± 0.86, p<0.01) and the number of diseased vessels was higher (2.75 ± 0.50 versus 1.48 ± 0.92, p<0.01) than in patients without post-stress LV dysfunction.

Conclusion: The LV volume and systolic function evaluated by cardiac MRI remained unchanged during vasodilator stress; however, LV dysfunction during vasodilator stress may occur in patients with severe CAD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources