Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Nov-Dec;31(6):877-882.
doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_779_19.

Retention and effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants placed with or without bonding agent in young permanent teeth: A randomized clinical trial with a year follow-up

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Retention and effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants placed with or without bonding agent in young permanent teeth: A randomized clinical trial with a year follow-up

Madhuri Bandi et al. Indian J Dent Res. 2020 Nov-Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Background and aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of pit and fissure sealants (PFS) placed on young permanent teeth with or without the application of the bonding agent.

Methods: A.

total of 100 permanent first molars from 25 children between 6-9 years of age were included and randomly allocated into 2 groups. In group A, the teeth received sealant with the bonding agent, and in group B, without a bonding agent. All the sealed teeth were evaluated for retention of the sealant at regular intervals of 3, 6, and 12 months. The difference in the retention rate with and without bonding was analyzed using Chi-square test.

Results: After 12 months, the clinically acceptable retention rates for PFS placed with and without bonding agent were 80% and 72%, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in relation to marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, and anatomic form among the PFS placed with and without bonding agent (Ps > 0.05).

Conclusions: Sealant application with bonding agent showed an increased retention rate than without the use of a bonding agent. However, an additional step of bonding may be excluded in children, as it did not show any statistically significant difference in clinical retention rate compared to PFS application without bonding.

Keywords: Bonding agent; permanent molars; pit and fissure sealants; retention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources