Efficacy and safety of perampanel in refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus: cohort study of 81 patients and literature review
- PMID: 33754209
- DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10506-9
Efficacy and safety of perampanel in refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus: cohort study of 81 patients and literature review
Abstract
Background: The effective dose of perampanel in status epilepticus (SE), refractory SE (RSE), and super-refractory SE (SRSE) in humans is unknown, and the potential of perampanel in treating SE has not been evaluated in a large cohort.
Methods: Data of intensive care patients with RSE and SRSE treated with perampanel were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.
Results: Eighty-one patients received perampanel, including 39 females with median age 64 [17-91] years, perampanel responders (n = 27), and non-responders (n = 54). The initial perampanel dose was positively associated with treatment response in patients with RSE or SRSE (OR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.03-1.57, p = 0.025), while the maximum dose was negatively associated with treatment response (OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.96, p = 0.022). Hypoxia caused seizures in six patients; five died in hospital and one had severe disability. A statistically non-significant tendency toward better response was found in patients with unique SE type and cause, particularly in nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) without coma (NCSE without coma vs. generalized tonic-clonic seizure: OR = 4.14, 95% CI 0.98-17.47, p = 0.053). In the high-dose (≥ 16 mg/day) groups, although distributions of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were similar between perampanel responders and non-responders at discharge, a greater proportion of perampanel responders had less change in mRS scores from baseline than did perampanel non-responders (median mRS: 0 vs 4, p = 0.064). No cardiorespiratory adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were noted with perampanel treatment.
Conclusions: Perampanel is effective and has a satisfactory safety profile in the emergency treatment of established RSE and SRSE.
Keywords: Modified Rankin Scale scores; Perampanel; Refractory status epilepticus; Status epilepticus; Super-refractory status epilepticus.
© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Logroscino G, Hesdorffer DC, Cascino G, Hauser WA, Coeytaux A, Galobardes B, Morabia A, Jallon P (2005) Mortality after a first episode of status epilepticus in the United States and Europe. Epilepsia 46(Suppl 11):46–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.00409.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Holtkamp M, Othman J, Buchheim K, Meierkord H (2005) Predictors and prognosis of refractory status epilepticus treated in a neurological intensive care unit. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76(4):534–539. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2004.041947 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Marawar R, Basha M, Mahulikar A, Desai A, Suchdev K, Shah A (2018) Updates in refractory status epilepticus. Crit Care Res Pract 2018:9768949. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9768949 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Novy J, Logroscino G, Rossetti AO (2010) Refractory status epilepticus: a prospective observational study. Epilepsia 51(2):251–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02323.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rossetti AO, Lowenstein DH (2011) Management of refractory status epilepticus in adults: still more questions than answers. Lancet Neurol 10(10):922–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70187-9 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
