Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone for oesophageal cancer: population-based cohort study
- PMID: 33755097
- DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa121
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone for oesophageal cancer: population-based cohort study
Abstract
Background: Although both neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and chemotherapy (nCT) are used as neoadjuvant treatment for oesophageal cancer, it is unknown whether one provides a survival advantage over the other, particularly with respect to histological subtype. This study aimed to compare prognosis after nCRT and nCT in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) or squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).
Methods: Data from the National Cancer Database (2006-2015) were used to identify patients with OAC and OSCC. Propensity score matching and Cox multivariable analyses were used to account for treatment selection biases.
Results: The study included 11 167 patients with OAC (nCRT 9972, 89.3 per cent; nCT 1195, 10.7 per cent) and 2367 with OSCC (nCRT 2155, 91.0 per cent; nCT 212, 9.0 per cent). In the matched OAC cohort, nCRT provided higher rates of complete pathological response (35.1 versus 21.0 per cent; P < 0.001) and margin-negative resections (90.1 versus 85.9 per cent; P < 0.001). However, patients who had nCRT had similar survival to those who received nCT (hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95 per cent c.i. 0.95 to 1.14). Five-year survival rates for patients who had nCRT and nCT were 36 and 37 per cent respectively (P = 0.123). For OSCC, nCRT had higher rates of complete pathological response (50.9 versus 30.4 per cent; P < 0.001) and margin-negative resections (92.8 versus 82.4 per cent; P < 0.001). A statistically significant overall survival benefit was evident for nCRT (HR 0.78, 0.62 to 0.97). Five-year survival rates for patients who had nCRT and nCT were 45.0 and 38.0 per cent respectively (P = 0.026).
Conclusion: Despite pathological benefits, including primary tumour response to nCRT, there was no prognostic benefit of nCRT compared with nCT for OAC suggesting that these two modalities are equally acceptable. However, for OSCC, nCRT followed by surgery appears to remain the optimal treatment approach.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Comment in
-
Comment on: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone for oesophageal cancer: population-based cohort study.Br J Surg. 2021 Aug 19;108(8):e278. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab153. Br J Surg. 2021. PMID: 34412119 No abstract available.
-
Author response to: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone for oesophageal cancer: population-based cohort study.Br J Surg. 2021 Aug 19;108(8):e279. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab154. Br J Surg. 2021. PMID: 34412120 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves survival in locally advanced adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a propensity score matching analysis.BMC Surg. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01136-z. BMC Surg. 2021. PMID: 33731072 Free PMC article.
-
Morbidity and mortality after surgery for cancer of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction: A randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. neoadjuvant chemoradiation.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul;41(7):920-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.03.226. Epub 2015 Apr 8. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25908010 Clinical Trial.
-
Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Should Be Targeted to Tumor Histology.Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Jan;107(1):187-193. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.07.089. Epub 2018 Sep 29. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019. PMID: 30278165
-
The current optimal multimodality treatments for oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Surg. 2018 Dec;60:88-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.10.037. Epub 2018 Oct 31. Int J Surg. 2018. PMID: 30389537
-
Comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.Future Oncol. 2019 Jul;15(20):2413-2422. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0024. Epub 2019 Jul 4. Future Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31269806
Cited by
-
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a patient with BRCA1 mutation: a rare association.Ecancermedicalscience. 2024 Jul 16;18:1730. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1730. eCollection 2024. Ecancermedicalscience. 2024. PMID: 39421182 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of the combination of sintilimab and chemotherapy on the tumor and paratumor PD-L1, IDO, TIM-3, FOXP3+ and CD8 expressions in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Thorac Cancer. 2022 Dec;13(23):3284-3294. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14683. Epub 2022 Oct 26. Thorac Cancer. 2022. PMID: 36288460 Free PMC article.
-
Author response to: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone for oesophageal cancer: population-based cohort study.Br J Surg. 2021 Aug 19;108(8):e279. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab154. Br J Surg. 2021. PMID: 34412120 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Prognostic nomogram for overall survival of elderly esophageal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy: a population-based analysis.J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Dec 31;15(6):2376-2388. doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-392. Epub 2024 Dec 4. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39816016 Free PMC article.
-
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus tislelizumab followed by surgery for esophageal carcinoma (CRISEC study): the protocol of a prospective, single-arm, phase II trial.BMC Cancer. 2023 Mar 15;23(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10687-8. BMC Cancer. 2023. PMID: 36922805 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical