Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct;40(10):3867-3874.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05696-6. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

A narrative review of imaging in calcinosis associated with systemic sclerosis

Affiliations
Review

A narrative review of imaging in calcinosis associated with systemic sclerosis

Diane Mar et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Calcinosis is dystrophic calcification of the soft tissue which can lead to painful and debilitating disease. It is commonly seen in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Imaging can assist in diagnosis, quantification of disease, and better pathophysiologic understanding of calcinosis. Traditionally, X-rays have been the most frequently used imaging modality for diagnosis; however, advances in ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have led to greater ability to characterize these lesions and surrounding structures. This narrative review aims to describe the use of imaging for calcinosis in patients with SSc. Key Points • Imaging is useful in the diagnosis of calcinosis, assessment of disease severity, and disease monitoring. • X-ray is commonly used and offers high sensitivity and specificity, but both ultrasound and CT-scans are alternatives when greater anatomic detail is sought regarding surrounding structures. • Investigational imaging modalities include dual energy CT-scans, cinematic rendering CT-scans, and PET- CT scans. • Conventional MRI scans have less sensitivity and specificity for detection of calcinosis.

Keywords: Calcinosis; Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Scleroderma; Ultrasound; X-ray.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reiter N, El-Shabrawi L, Leinweber B et al (2011) Calcinosis cutis: Part I. Diagnostic pathway. J Am Acad Dermatol 65:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2010.08.038 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boulman N, Slobodin G, Rozenbaum M, Rosner I (2005) Calcinosis in rheumatic diseases. Semin Arthritis Rheum 34:805–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2005.01.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Freire V, Moser TP, Lepage-Saucier M (2018) Radiological identification and analysis of soft tissue musculoskeletal calcifications. Insights Imaging 9:477–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0619-0 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Gutierrez A Jr, Wetter DA (2012) Calcinosis cutis in autoimmune connective tissue diseases. Dermatol Ther 25:195–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8019.2012.01492.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hsu V, Bramwit M, Schlesinger N (2015) Use of dual-energy computed tomography for the evaluation of calcinosis in patients with systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol 34:1557–1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-015-2998-7 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources