Efficacy of evoked potential monitoring for predicting postoperative motor status in internal carotid artery aneurysm surgeries
- PMID: 33755845
- DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00693-1
Efficacy of evoked potential monitoring for predicting postoperative motor status in internal carotid artery aneurysm surgeries
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring for predicting postoperative motor deficits (PMDs) in patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms. The data for 138 patients with ICA aneurysms who underwent surgical clipping as well as their intraoperative neuromonitoring data were retrospectively reviewed. The efficacy of MEP/SSEP changes for predicting PMDs was assessed using binary logistic regression analysis. Subsequently, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to obtain a supplementary critical value of the MEP/SSEP deterioration duration. The sensitivity and specificity of MEP changes for predicting PMDs were 0.824 and 0.843, respectively. For SSEP changes, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.529 and 0.959, respectively. MEP and SSEP changes were identified as independent predictors for short-term (p = 0.002 and 0.011, respectively) and long-term PMDs (p = 0.040 and 0.006, respectively). The supplementary critical value for MEP deterioration duration for predicting PMDs was 14 min (p = 0.007, AUC = 0.805). For SSEP, the value was 14.5 min (p = 0.042, AUC = 0.875). The MEP/SSEP changes adjusted by those optimal values were also identified as independent predictors for short-term (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively) and long-term PMDs (p = 0.019 and 0.003, respectively). Intraoperative MEP and SSEP deterioration durations are effective in predicting PMDs in patients with ICA aneurysms.
Keywords: Internal carotid artery aneurysm; Intraoperative evoked potentials; Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring; Postoperative motor deficits.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Similar articles
-
Intraoperative motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during surgical clipping of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a comparative study.J Neurosurg. 2021 Nov 26;137(1):140-147. doi: 10.3171/2021.8.JNS21479. Print 2022 Jul 1. J Neurosurg. 2021. PMID: 34826813
-
Variability of somatosensory evoked potential and motor evoked potential change criteria in thoracic spinal decompression surgery based on preoperative motor status.Spine J. 2024 Mar;24(3):506-518. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.10.009. Epub 2023 Oct 21. Spine J. 2024. PMID: 37871658
-
Effectiveness of MEP and SSEP Monitoring in the Diagnosis of Neurological Dysfunction Immediately After Craniotomy Aneurysm Clipping.J Craniofac Surg. 2024 Jan-Feb 01;35(1):e38-e44. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009825. Epub 2023 Nov 9. J Craniofac Surg. 2024. PMID: 37943050
-
What is the predictive value of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring for postoperative neurological deficit in cervical spine surgery?-a meta-analysis.Spine J. 2021 Apr;21(4):555-570. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.010. Epub 2021 Jan 16. Spine J. 2021. PMID: 33460808 Review.
-
Intraoperative evoked potential monitoring for detecting cerebral injury during adult aneurysm clipping surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 12;9(2):e022810. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022810. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30760514 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Motor Evoked Potential Warning Criteria in Supratentorial Surgery: A Scoping Review.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 4;13(11):2803. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112803. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34199853 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive value of neurophysiological monitoring during posterior communicating artery aneurysm clipping for postoperative neurological deficits.Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1043428. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1043428. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 36684148 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Brisman JL, Song JK, Newell DW. Cerebral aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(9):928–39. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra052760 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chalouhi N, Hoh BL, Hasan D. Review of cerebral aneurysm formation, growth, and rupture. Stroke. 2013;44(12):3613–22. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002390 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chung J, Park W, Hong SH, Park JC, Ahn JS, Kwun BD, Lee SA, Kim SH, Jeon JY. Intraoperative use of transcranial motor/sensory evoked potential monitoring in the clipping of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation of false-positive and false-negative cases. J Neurosurg. 2018;130(3):936–48. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.8.JNS17791 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Thomas B, Guo D. The diagnostic accuracy of evoked potential monitoring techniques during intracranial aneurysm surgery for predicting postoperative ischemic damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2017;103(829–840):e823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.071 . - DOI
-
- MacDonald DB. Overview on criteria for MEP monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;34(1):4–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000302 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous