Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 1;94(1121):20200445.
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200445. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

Feasibility and safety of percutaneous computed tomography guided radiofrequency ablation of lymph nodes in oligometastatic patients: a single center's experience

Affiliations

Feasibility and safety of percutaneous computed tomography guided radiofrequency ablation of lymph nodes in oligometastatic patients: a single center's experience

Dimitrios Filippiadis et al. Br J Radiol. .

Abstract

Objectives: To retrospectively evaluate feasibility and safety of CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of metastatic lymph nodes (LN) in terms of achieving local tumor control.

Methods: Institutional database research identified 16 patients with 24 metastatic LNs who underwent percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation. Mean patient age was 66.6 ± 15.70 years (range 40-87) and male/female ratio was 8/8. Contrast-enhanced CT or MRI was used for post-ablation follow-up. Patient and tumor characteristics and RFA technique were evaluated. Technical and clinical success on per tumor and per patient basis as well as complication rates were recorded.

Results: Mean size of the treated nodes was 1.78 ± 0.83 cm. The mean number of tumors per patient was 1.5 ± 0.63. The mean procedure time was 56.29 ± 24.27 min including local anesthesia, electrode(s) placement, ablation and post-procedural CT evaluation. Median length of hospital stay was 1.13 ± 0.34 days. On a per lesion basis, the overall complete response post-ablation according to the mRECIST criteria applied was 75% (18/24) of evaluable tumors. Repeat treatment of an index tumor was performed on two patients (three lesions) with complete response achieved in 87.5% (21/24) of evaluable tumors following a second RFA. On a per patient basis, disease progression was noted in 10/16 patients at a mean of 13.9 ± 6.03 months post the ablation procedure.

Conclusion: CT-guided percutaneous RFA for oligometastatic LNs is a safe and feasible therapy.

Advances in knowledge: With this percutaneous therapeutic option, metastatic LNs can be eradicated with a very low complication rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A 50-year-old male patient with hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic lymph node: A: CT axial scan illustrates the lymph node along the right mammary vessels. B: Patient underwent CT-guided percutaneous RFA; the active tip of the electrode was placed inside the lymph node. C: MRI 6 months post-RFA shows no contrast enhancement of the lymph node. RFA, radiofrequency ablation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A 61-year-old male patient with a solitary metastatic lymph node in para-aortic location post nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (white circle). B: Patient underwent CT-guided percutaneous RFA. Hydrodissection was performed with dextrose 5% mixed to contrast medium. C: CT scan post-i.v. contrast medium injection shows no contrast enhancement of the lymph node. i.v., intravenous; RFA, radiofrequencyablation.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
A PET scan of a 73-year-old female patient with colorectal cancer showing avidity in a metastatic lymph node in para-aortic location (black circle). B: Patient underwent CT-guided percutaneous RFA. C: MRI 3 months post-RFA shows no contrast enhancement (white circle) of the lymph node. PET, positron emissiontomography; RFA, radiofrequency ablation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;. ; 68: 7–302018. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Massagué J, Obenauf AC. Metastatic colonization by circulating tumour cells. Nature 2016; 529: 298–306. doi: 10.1038/nature17038 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Obinu A, Gavini E, Rassu G, Maestri M, Bonferoni MC, Giunchedi P. Lymph node metastases: importance of detection and treatment strategies. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2018; 15: 459–67. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2018.1446937 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kodama T, Matsuki D, Tada A, Takeda K, Mori S. New concept for the prevention and treatment of metastatic lymph nodes using chemotherapy administered via the lymphatic network. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 32506. doi: 10.1038/srep32506 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pan T, Xie Q-K, Lv N, Li X-S, Mu L-W, Wu P-H, , LW M, PH W, et al. . Percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation for lymph node Oligometastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity Score-matching analysis. Radiology 2017; 282: 259–70. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016151807 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms