Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 23;12(1):4.
doi: 10.1186/s13326-021-00240-6.

Why and how to engage expert stakeholders in ontology development: insights from social and behavioural sciences

Emma Norris  1   2 , Janna Hastings  3 , Marta M Marques  3   4 , Ailbhe N Finnerty Mutlu  3 , Silje Zink  3   5 , Susan Michie  3
Affiliations
Review

Why and how to engage expert stakeholders in ontology development: insights from social and behavioural sciences

Emma Norris et al. J Biomed Semantics. .

Abstract

Background: Incorporating the feedback of expert stakeholders in ontology development is important to ensure content is appropriate, comprehensive, meets community needs and is interoperable with other ontologies and classification systems. However, domain experts are often not formally engaged in ontology development, and there is little available guidance on how this involvement should best be conducted and managed. Social and behavioural science studies often involve expert feedback in the development of tools and classification systems but have had little engagement with ontology development. This paper aims to (i) demonstrate how expert feedback can enhance ontology development, and (ii) provide practical recommendations on how to conduct expert feedback in ontology development using methodologies from the social and behavioural sciences.

Main body: Considerations for selecting methods for engaging stakeholders are presented. Mailing lists and issue trackers as existing methods used frequently in ontology development are discussed. Advisory boards and working groups, feedback tasks, consensus exercises, discussions and workshops are presented as potential methods from social and behavioural sciences to incorporate in ontology development.

Conclusions: A variety of methods from the social and behavioural sciences exist to enable feedback from expert stakeholders in ontology development. Engaging domain experts in ontology development enables depth and clarity in ontology development, whilst also establishing advocates for an ontology upon its completion.

Keywords: Feedback; Ontology development; Social sciences; Stakeholders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests to declare.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Arp R, Smith B, Spear AD. Building ontologies with basic formal ontology. MIT Press; 2015.
    1. Noy NF, McGuinness DL. Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford knowledge systems laboratory technical report. KSL-01-05 and &#8230.
    1. Boaz A, Hanney S, Borst R, O’Shea A, Kok M. How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement. Health Research Policy Systems. 2018;16(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0337-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop DV, Button KS, Chambers CD, Du Sert NP, et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour. 2017;1(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data. 2016;3(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources