Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 2;22(5):bbab030.
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbab030.

Genome-resolved metagenomics using environmental and clinical samples

Affiliations
Review

Genome-resolved metagenomics using environmental and clinical samples

Masood Ur Rehman Kayani et al. Brief Bioinform. .

Abstract

Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies and computational methods have added a new dimension to metagenomic data analysis i.e. genome-resolved metagenomics. In general terms, it refers to the recovery of draft or high-quality microbial genomes and their taxonomic classification and functional annotation. In recent years, several studies have utilized the genome-resolved metagenome analysis approach and identified previously unknown microbial species from human and environmental metagenomes. In this review, we describe genome-resolved metagenome analysis as a series of four necessary steps: (i) preprocessing of the sequencing reads, (ii) de novo metagenome assembly, (iii) genome binning and (iv) taxonomic and functional analysis of the recovered genomes. For each of these four steps, we discuss the most commonly used tools and the currently available pipelines to guide the scientific community in the recovery and subsequent analyses of genomes from any metagenome sample. Furthermore, we also discuss the tools required for validation of assembly quality as well as for improving quality of the recovered genomes. We also highlight the currently available pipelines that can be used to automate the whole analysis without having advanced bioinformatics knowledge. Finally, we will highlight the most widely adapted and actively maintained tools and pipelines that can be helpful to the scientific community in decision making before they commence the analysis.

Keywords: MAG annotation; MAG refinement; MAG taxonomic classification; de novo assembly; genome binning; metagenome assembly validation; metagenome-assembled genomes; read preprocessing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the workflow for genome-resolved metagenomics analysis. The typical genome-resolved analysis of metagenomes, obtained through any source, typically involves four steps i.e. (1) read preprocessing, (2) metagenome assembly and QC, (3) genome binning and refinement and (4) taxonomic and functional annotation of the recovered MAGs. In the figure, examples of several tools for each of the steps is also provided (names italicized).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. Metagenomics. Nature 2008;455:481–3. - PubMed
    1. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, et al. . The human microbiome project. Nature 2007;449:804–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sunagawa S, Coelho LP, Chaffron S, et al. . Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science 2015;348. - PubMed
    1. Hu Y, Yang X, Qin J, et al. . Metagenome-wide analysis of antibiotic resistance genes in a large cohort of human gut microbiota. Nat Commun 2013;4:1–7. - PubMed
    1. Shreiner AB, Kao JY, Young VB. The gut microbiome in health and in disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2015;31:69. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types