Simplified biplanar (0-90°) fluoroscopic puncture technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the learning curve
- PMID: 33758960
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03669-7
Simplified biplanar (0-90°) fluoroscopic puncture technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the learning curve
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the learning curve of the simplified fluoroscopic biplanar (0-90º) puncture technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Methods: We prospectively evaluated patients with renal stones treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy by a single institution's fellows employing the simplified bi-planar (0-90º) fluoroscopic puncture technique for renal access. The learning curve was assessed with the fluoroscopic screening time and the percutaneous renal puncture time. Data obtained were compared to a subset of patients operated by a senior surgeon.
Results: Eighty-nine patients were included in the study. Forty patients were operated by fellow-1, 39 by fellow-2, and 10 patients by the senior surgeon. Demographic data of all patients between groups were homogeneous, with no difference in gender (p = 0.432), age (p = 0.92), stone volume (p = 0.78), puncture laterality (p = 0.755), and body mass index (p = 0.365). The mean puncture time was 7.5, 4, and 3.1 min for fellow-1, fellow-2, and expert, respectively. The mean fluoroscopic screening time for the puncture was 10, 11, and 5.1 s for fellow-1, fellow-2, and the expert, respectively. Stone cases, both fellows needed to complete 10 procedures to match the senior surgeon in the mean puncture time (p = 0.046); meanwhile, the fluoroscopic screening time was equal even before to complete 10 procedures.
Conclusion: This study suggests that with the simplified biplanar (0-90º) puncture technique, the fluoroscopic screening time used in the learning process is brief. A novice fellow could require to complete ten cases to flatten the learning curve treating complex stone cases, and a flat learning curve is seen since the beginning when treating simple renal stones.
Keywords: Fluoroscopy; Learning curve; Percutaneous; Puncture; Radiation; Renal stones.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL et al (2016) Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline part II. J Urol 196(4):1161–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M et al (2007) 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 178:2418–2434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.107 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wen CC, Nakada SY (2007) Treatment selection and outcomes: renal calculi. Urol Clin North Am 34:409–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2007.04.005 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Manzo BO, Gómez F, Figueroa A, Sanchez HM, Leal M, Emiliani E et al (2020) A new simplified biplanar (0–90°) fluoroscopic puncture technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Reducing fluoroscopy without ultrasound initial experience and outcomes. Urology 140:165–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.002 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
