Effects of stress exposure in captivity on physiology and infection in avian hosts: no evidence of increased Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. infectivity to vector ticks
- PMID: 33758979
- DOI: 10.1007/s00248-021-01738-3
Effects of stress exposure in captivity on physiology and infection in avian hosts: no evidence of increased Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. infectivity to vector ticks
Abstract
Exposure to environmental stressors, an increasingly recurring event in natural communities due to anthropogenic-induced environmental change, profoundly impacts disease emergence and spread. One mechanism through which this occurs is through stress-induced immunosuppression increasing disease susceptibility, prevalence, intensity and reactivation in hosts. We experimentally evaluated how exposure to stressors affected both the physiology of avian hosts and the prevalence of the zoonotic bacteria Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.), in two model species-the blackbird Turdus merula and the robin Erithacus rubecula captured in the wild, using xenodiagnoses and analysis of skin biopsies and blood. Although exposure to stressors in captivity induced physiological stress in birds (increased the number of circulating heterophils), there was no evidence of increased infectivity to xenodiagnostic ticks. However, Borrelia detection in the blood for both experimental groups of blackbirds was higher by the end of the captivity period. The infectivity and efficiency of transmission were higher for blackbirds than robins. When comparing different methodologies to determine infection status, xenodiagnosis was a more sensitive method than skin biopsies and blood samples, which could be attributed to mild levels of infection in these avian hosts and/or dynamics and timing of Borrelia infection relapses and redistribution in tissues.
Keywords: Birds; Borrelia; Immunosuppression; Reservoir host; Stress; Xenodiagnosis.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Brearley G, Rhodes J, Bradley A, Baxter G, Seabrook L, Lunney D, Liu Y, McAlpine C (2013) Wildlife disease prevalence in human-modified landscapes. Biol Rev 88:427–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12009 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Glaser R, Kiecolt-Glaser JK (2005) Stress-induced immune dysfunction: implications for health. Nat Rev Immunol 5:243–251. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1571 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Duffus ALJ (2009) Effects of environmental change on wildlife health. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 364:3429–3438. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0128 - DOI
-
- Lafferty KD, Gerber LR (2002) Good medicine for conservation biology: the intersection of epidemiology and conservation theory. Conserv Biol 16:593–604 - DOI
-
- Dobson A, Foufopoulos J (2001) Emerging infectious pathogens of wildlife. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 356:1001–1012 - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- MARE - UID/MAR/04292/2020/Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- SFRH/BPD/108197/2015/Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- DL57/2016/CP1370/CT89/Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- PTDC/BIA-EVL/31569/2017 - NORTE -01-0145- FEDER-30288/Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- DL57/2016/CP1440/CT0006/Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
