Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021:2266:203-226.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1209-5_12.

Free Energy Calculations for Protein-Ligand Binding Prediction

Affiliations
Review

Free Energy Calculations for Protein-Ligand Binding Prediction

Willem Jespers et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2021.

Abstract

Computational prediction of protein-ligand binding involves initial determination of the binding mode and subsequent evaluation of the strength of the protein-ligand interactions, which directly correlates with ligand binding affinities. As a consequence of increasing computer power, rigorous approaches to calculate protein-ligand binding affinities, such as free energy perturbation (FEP) methods, are becoming an essential part of the toolbox of computer-aided drug design. In this chapter, we provide a general overview of these methods and introduce the QFEP modules, which are open-source API workflows based on our molecular dynamics (MD) package Q. The module QligFEP allows estimation of relative binding affinities along ligand series, while QresFEP is a module to estimate binding affinity shifts caused by single-point mutations of the protein. We herein provide guidelines for the use of each of these modules based on data extracted from ligand-design projects. While these modules are stand-alone, the combined use of the two workflows in a drug-design project yields complementary perspectives of the ligand binding problem, providing two sides of the same coin. The selected case studies illustrate how to use QFEP to approach the two key questions associated with ligand binding prediction: identifying the most favorable binding mode from different alternatives and establishing structure-affinity relationships that allow the rational optimization of hit compounds.

Keywords: Binding free energy; Free energy perturbation (FEP); Molecular dynamics (MD); Structure-based drug design (SBDD).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wang J, Wolf RM, Caldwell JW et al (2004) Development and testing of a general Amber force field. J Comput Chem 25:1157–1174 - PubMed - DOI - PMC
    1. Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A et al (2006) Comparison of multiple amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters, vol 65, p 712
    1. Huang J, Mackerell AD (2013) CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: validation based on comparison to NMR data. J Comput Chem 34:2135–2145 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Robertson MJ, Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL (2015) Improved peptide and protein torsional energetics with the OPLS-AA force field. J Chem Theory Comput 11:3499–3509 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Dodda LS, De VIC, Tirado-Rives J et al (2017) LigParGen web server: an automatic OPLS-AA parameter generator for organic ligands. Nucleic Acids Res 45:W331–W336 - PubMed - PMC - DOI

LinkOut - more resources