Recent progress and remaining hurdles toward clinical xenotransplantation
- PMID: 33759229
- DOI: 10.1111/xen.12681
Recent progress and remaining hurdles toward clinical xenotransplantation
Abstract
Background: Xenotransplantation has made tremendous progress over the last decade.
Methods: We discuss kidney and heart xenotransplantation, which are nearing initial clinical trials.
Results: Life sustaining genetically modified kidney xenografts can now last for approximately 500 days and orthotopic heart xenografts for 200 days in non-human primates. Anti-swine specific antibody screening, preemptive desensitization protocols, complement inhibition and targeted immunosuppression are currently being adapted to xenotransplantation with the hope to achieve better control of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and improve xenograft longevity. These newest advances could probably facilitate future clinical trials, a significant step for the medical community, given that dialysis remains difficult for many patients and can have prohibitive costs. Performing a successful pig-to-human clinical kidney xenograft, that could last for more than a year after transplant, seems feasible but it still has significant potential hurdles to overcome. The risk/benefit balance is progressively reaching an acceptable equilibrium for future human recipients, e.g. those with a life expectancy inferior to two years. The ultimate question at this stage would be to determine if a "proof of concept" in humans is desirable, or whether further experimental/pre-clinical advances are still needed to demonstrate longer xenograft survival in non-human primates.
Conclusion: In this review, we discuss the most recent advances in kidney and heart xenotransplantation, with a focus on the prevention and treatment of AMR and on the recipient's selection, two aspects that will likely be the major points of discussion in the first pig organ xenotransplantation clinical trials.
Keywords: antibody; antibody-mediated rejection; antigen; clinical trial; complement; donor selection; genetic engineering; heart; kidney; pig; xenotransplantation.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Ekser B, Ezzelarab M, Hara H, et al. Clinical xenotransplantation: the next medical revolution? Lancet. 2012;379(9816):672-683.
-
- https://www.organdonor.gov/statistics-stories/statistics.html. Accessed February 29, 2020
-
- Giwa S, Lewis JK, Alvarez L, et al. The promise of organ and tissue preservation to transform medicine. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(6):530-542.
-
- Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2018 annual data report: kidney. Am J Transplant. 2020;20(suppl s1):20-130.
-
- Nordio M, Limido A, Maggiore U, et al. Survival in patients treated by long-term dialysis compared with the general population. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59(6):819-828.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical