Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2021 Mar:24 Suppl 1:3-4.
doi: 10.1111/ocr.12472.

TSADs special issue

No authors listed
Editorial

TSADs special issue

No authors listed. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Mar.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

REFERENCES

    1. Jang Y-K, Chung D-H, Lee J-W, Lee S-M, Park JH. A comparative evaluation of midfacial soft tissue and nasal bone changes with two maxillary protraction protocols: Tooth-borne vs skeletal-anchored facemasks. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020; 24(Suppl. 1): 5-12.
    1. Cha B-K, Park JH, Choi D-S, Jang I. Facemask therapy with skeletal anchorage: A possible alternative to orthognathic surgery. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020; 24(Suppl. 1): 13-20.
    1. Ahn H-W, Kim S-J, Baek S-H. Miniplate-anchored maxillary protraction in adolescent patients with cleft lip and palate: A literature review of study design, type and protocol, and treatment outcomes. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020; 24(Suppl. 1): 21-30.
    1. Kang H-J, Lee N-K, Kim J-H, Park JH, Kim Y-J, Kook Y-A. Factors associated with the maxillary third molar position after total arch distalization using a modified C-palatal plate in adolescents. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020; 24(Suppl. 1): 31-38.
    1. Park K-H, Choi J-Y, Kim KA, Kim S-J, Chung K-R, Kim S-H. Critical issues concerning biocreative strategy in contemporary temporary skeletal anchorage device orthodontics: A narrative review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020; 24(Suppl. 1): 39-47.

LinkOut - more resources