Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;16(4):e12374.
doi: 10.1111/opn.12374. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

Towards the development of a national patient transfer document between residential and acute care-A pilot study

Dympna Tuohy  1 , Anne Fahy  1 , Jane O'Doherty  1 , Pauline Meskell  1 , Pauline O'Reilly  1 , Brid O'Brien  1 , Jill Murphy  1 , Owen Doody  1 , Margaret Graham  1 , Louise Barry  1 , Michelle Kiely  2 , Jonathon O'Keeffe  3 , Jan Dewing  4 , Deirdre Lang  5 , Alice Coffey  1
Affiliations

Towards the development of a national patient transfer document between residential and acute care-A pilot study

Dympna Tuohy et al. Int J Older People Nurs. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: A lack of standardisation of documentation accompanying older people when transferring from residential to acute care is common and this may result in gaps in information and in care for older people. In Ireland, this lack of standardisation prompted the development of an evidence based national transfer document.

Objectives: To pilot a new national transfer document for use when transferring older people from residential to acute care and obtain the perceptions of its use from staff in residential and acute care settings.

Methods: This was a pre- and post-study design using purposive sampling following the STROBE guidelines. The pilot was conducted in 26 sites providing residential care and three university hospitals providing acute care. Pre-pilot questionnaires focused on current documentation and were distributed to staff in residential care (n = 875). A pilot of the new paper-based transfer document was then conducted over three months and post-pilot questionnaires distributed to staff from both residential and acute care settings (n = 1085). The findings of the pilot study were discussed with multidisciplinary expert advisory and stakeholder groups who recommended some revisions. This consensus informed the development of the final design of the new revised transfer document.

Results: Pre-pilot: 23% response rate; 83% (n = 168) participants agreed/strongly agreed that existing documentation was straightforward to complete but could be more person-centred. Post-pilot: 11% response rate; 75% (n = 93) of participants agreed/strongly agreed that the new transfer document promoted person-centred care but recommended revisions to the new document regarding layout and time to complete.

Conclusions: This study highlighted some of the challenges of providing safe, effective and relevant transfer information that is feasible and usable in everyday practice.

Implications for practice: Standardisation and being person-centred are important determining factors in the provision of relevant up to date information on the resident being transferred.

Keywords: older people; older person; person-centred care; pilot; residential setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest has been declared with the authors.

The final article version has been agreed by all authors. The criteria as per the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) have been upheld by all authors.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Current transfer document components
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Pilot transfer document components
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Arendts, G., Popescu, A., Howting, D., Quine, S., & Howard, K. (2013). They never talked to me about: Perspectives on aged care resident transfer to emergency departments. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 34(2), 95–102. 10.1111/ajag.12125 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbadoro, P., Di Tondo, E., Menditto, V. G., Pennacchietti, L., Regnicoli, F., Di Stanislao, F., D'Errico, M. M., & Prospero, E. (2015). Emergency department non‐urgent visits and hospital readmissions are associated with different socio‐economic variables in Italy. PLoS One, 10(6), e0127823. 10.1371/journal.pone.0127823 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. Nursing Plus Open, 2, 8–14. 10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001 - DOI
    1. Boltz, M., Parke, B., Shuluk, J., Capezuti, E., & Galvin, J. (2013). Care of the Older Adult in the Emergency Department: Nurses Views of the Pressing Issues. The Gerontologist, 53(3), 441–453. 10.1093/geront/gnt004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources