Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;30(13-14):2015-2022.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.15754. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

Comparing dysmenorrhea beliefs and self-management techniques across symptom-based phenotypes

Sarah Katherine Rogers  1 , Kevin L Rand  2 , Chen Xiao Chen  2
Affiliations

Comparing dysmenorrhea beliefs and self-management techniques across symptom-based phenotypes

Sarah Katherine Rogers et al. J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare beliefs about dysmenorrhea and self-management techniques across three dysmenorrhea symptom-based phenotypes.

Background: Many reproductive-age women experience dysmenorrhea, with varying symptoms and intensity. Dysmenorrhea symptom-based phenotypes have been identified in previous research, defining distinctive phenotypes of mild localised pain, severe localised pain, and multiple severe symptoms. It is unknown if women from different phenotypes hold different beliefs about dysmenorrhea or if they engage in different self-management techniques.

Design: Quantitative secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data.

Methods: This online study surveyed 762 women with dysmenorrhea in the United States. Participants reported their dysmenorrhea symptom intensity, beliefs about dysmenorrhea (i.e. beliefs about consequences, timeline, controllability, symptom severity, normalcy, emotional response to symptoms and treatments) and self-management techniques to prevent or treat symptoms. Beliefs regarding dysmenorrhea and types of self-management techniques used were compared across three phenotypes utilising ANOVA tests and Tukey's HSD for pairwise comparisons. Reporting followed the STROBE guidelines.

Results: Women with multiple severe symptoms had significantly more negative beliefs regarding dysmenorrhea and utilised significantly more self-management techniques than women with severe localised pain and women with mild localised pain. Women with severe localised pain had significantly more negative beliefs regarding dysmenorrhea and utilised significantly more self-management techniques than women with mild localised pain. Negative beliefs regarding dysmenorrhea included: consequences of dysmenorrhea, timeline of symptoms, personal and treatment control, symptom severity, normalcy of symptoms, emotional response to symptoms and willingness to utilise complementary medicine.

Conclusion: Results further support the distinction between dysmenorrhea symptom-based phenotypes. Not only do women in different phenotypes experience different severity and number of dysmenorrhea symptoms, they also perceive and manage their dysmenorrhea differently.

Relevance to clinical practice: These findings have implications for tailoring interventions to different dysmenorrhea symptom-based phenotypes.

Keywords: Beliefs; Dysmenorrhea; Self-Management; Severity; Symptom-Based Phenotypes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

References

    1. Adrián-Arrieta L, & Casas-Fernández de Tejerina JM (2018). Self-perception of disease in patients with chronic diseases. Semergen, 44(5), 335–341. doi:10.1016/j.semerg.2017.10.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ameade EPK, Amalba A, & Mohammed BS (2018). Prevalence of dysmenorrhea among University students in Northern Ghana; its impact and management strategies. BMC Women’s Health, 18, 1-1. doi:10.1186/s12905-018-0532-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armour M, Smith CA, Steel KA, & Macmillan F (2019). The effectiveness of self-care and lifestyle interventions in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med, 19(1), 22. doi:10.1186/s12906-019-2433-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banikarim C, Chacko MR, Kelder SH. (2000). Prevalence and impact of dysmenorrhea on Hispanic female adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 154(12):1226–9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.12.1226. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bishop FL, Yardley L, & Lewith G (2005). Developing a measure of treatment beliefs: the complementary and alternative medicine beliefs inventory. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 13(2), 144–149. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2005.01.005 - DOI - PubMed