UK consultants' experiences of the decision-making process around referral to intensive care: an interview study
- PMID: 33762241
- PMCID: PMC7993217
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044752
UK consultants' experiences of the decision-making process around referral to intensive care: an interview study
Abstract
Objective: The decision whether to initiate intensive care for the critically ill patient involves ethical questions regarding what is good and right for the patient. It is not clear how referring doctors negotiate these issues in practice. The aim of this study was to describe and understand consultants' experiences of the decision-making process around referral to intensive care.
Design: Qualitative interviews were analysed according to a phenomenological hermeneutical method.
Setting and participants: Consultant doctors (n=27) from departments regularly referring patients to intensive care in six UK hospitals.
Results: In the precarious and uncertain situation of critical illness, trust in the decision-making process is needed and can be enhanced through the way in which the process unfolds. When there are no obvious right or wrong answers as to what ought to be done, how the decision is made and how the process unfolds is morally important. Through acknowledging the burdensome doubts in the process, contributing to an emerging, joint understanding of the patient's situation, and responding to mutual moral duties of the doctors involved, trust in the decision-making process can be enhanced and a shared moral responsibility between the stake holding doctors can be assumed.
Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of trust in the decision-making process and how the relationships between the stakeholding doctors are crucial to support their moral responsibility for the patient. Poor interpersonal relationships can damage trust and negatively impact decisions made on behalf of a critically ill patient. For this reason, active attempts must be made to foster good relationships between doctors. This is not only important to create a positive working environment, but a mechanism to improve patient outcomes.
Keywords: adult intensive & critical care; medical ethics; qualitative research.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Developing an intervention around referral and admissions to intensive care: a mixed-methods study.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2019 Nov. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2019 Nov. PMID: 31765112 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Qualitative study exploring the well-being experiences of paediatric critical care consultants working in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 29;12(8):e063697. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063697. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36038166 Free PMC article.
-
Decision-making around admission to intensive care in the UK pre-COVID-19: a multicentre ethnographic study.Anaesthesia. 2021 Apr;76(4):489-499. doi: 10.1111/anae.15272. Epub 2020 Nov 3. Anaesthesia. 2021. PMID: 33141939
-
Do consultants do what they say they do? Observational study of the extent to which clinicians involve their patients in the decision-making process.BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 5;12(1):e056471. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056471. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 34987047 Free PMC article.
-
End-of-life decisions in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) - Exploring the experiences of ICU nurses and doctors - A critical literature review.Aust Crit Care. 2016 May;29(2):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Sep 19. Aust Crit Care. 2016. PMID: 26388551 Review.
References
-
- ICNARC . Key statistics from the Case Mix Programme - Adult, general critical care units 1, April 2015 to 31 March 2016. 2017.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources