Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;8(1):e000880.
doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000880.

Feasibility of an online platform delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation for individuals with chronic respiratory disease

Adam Lewis  1 , Ellena Knight  2 , Matthew Bland  2 , Jack Middleton  3 , Esther Mitchell  2 , Kate McCrum  4 , Joy Conway  5 , Elaine Bevan-Smith  2
Affiliations

Feasibility of an online platform delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation for individuals with chronic respiratory disease

Adam Lewis et al. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 has restricted access to face-to-face delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Evidence suggests that telehealth-PR is non-inferior to outpatient PR. However, it is unknown whether patients who have been referred to face-to-face programmes can feasibly complete an online-PR programme.

Methods: This service evaluation used a mixed-methods approach to investigate a rapid PR service remodelling using the University of Gloucestershire eLearn Moodle platform. Quantitative baseline demographic and PR outcome data were collected from online-PR participants, and semistructured interviews were completed with PR staff and participants.

Results: Twenty-five individuals were eligible from a PR waiting list. Thirteen declined participation and 14 completed PR. Significant pre-post online PR improvements were achieved in 1 min sit-to-stand (CI 2.1 to 9 (p=0.004)), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (CI -0.3 to -2.6 (p=0.023)), Primary Health Questionnaire-9 (CI -0.3 to -5.1 (p=0.029)), Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire dyspnoea (CI 0.5 to 1.3 (p=0.001)), fatigue (CI 0.7 to 2 (p=0.0004)), emotion (CI 0.7 to 1.7 (p=0.0002)), mastery (CI 0.4 to 1.3 (p=0.001)). Interviews indicated that patient PR inclusion was made possible with digital support and a PR introduction session improved participant engagement and safety. Incremental progression of exercise was perceived as more successful online compared with face-to-face PR. However, perceptions were that education sessions were less successful. Online-PR required significant staff time resource.

Discussion: Online-PR improves patient outcomes and is feasible and acceptable for individuals referred for face-to-face PR in the context of a requirement for social distancing. Face-to-face programmes can be adapted in a rapid fashion with both staff and participants perceiving benefit. Future pragmatic trials are now warranted comparing online-PR including remote assessments to centre-based PR with suitably matched outcomes, and patient and staff perceptions sought regarding barriers and facilitators of online delivery.

Keywords: COVID-19; emphysema; pulmonary rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Philip K, Cumella A, Farrington-Douglas J, et al. . Respiratory patient experience of measures to reduce risk of COVID-19: findings from a descriptive cross-sectional UK wide survey. BMJ Open 2020;10:e040951. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040951 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Philip KEJ, Polkey MI, Hopkinson NS, et al. . Social isolation, loneliness and physical performance in older-adults: fixed effects analyses of a cohort study. Sci Rep 2020;10:13908. 10.1038/s41598-020-70483-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hume E, Armstrong M, Manifield J, et al. . Impact of COVID-19 shielding on physical activity and quality of life in patients with COPD. Breathe 2020;16:200231. 10.1183/20734735.0231-2020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bourne S, DeVos R, North M, et al. . Online versus face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2017;7:e014580. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014580 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hansen H, Bieler T, Beyer N, et al. . Supervised pulmonary tele-rehabilitation versus pulmonary rehabilitation in severe COPD: a randomised multicentre trial. Thorax 2020;75:413–21. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214246 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms