Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 24;11(1):6761.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86238-7.

Significant impact of circulating tumour DNA mutations on survival in metastatic breast cancer patients

Affiliations

Significant impact of circulating tumour DNA mutations on survival in metastatic breast cancer patients

Axel Muendlein et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Mutational analysis of circulating tumour (ct) DNA holds promise as an effective tool to predict the course of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In the present study we used targeted next generation sequencing of ctDNA to evaluate the impact of cancer driven mutations on the prognosis of MBC. The study included 59 oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative MBC patients. Sequencing analysis was performed in ESR1, PIK3CA, ERBB2, PTEN, TP53, KRAS, HRAS, NRAS, and AR. At baseline, patients started receiving either chemotherapy (34%; n = 20) or cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor therapy in combination with endocrine therapy (CDK4/6i+ET; 66%; n = 39). Overall, 64.4% (n = 38) of the patients carried at least one pathogenic or likely-pathogenic mutation. Number of ctDNA mutations was significantly linked with worse progression free survival (PFS; p = 0.003) and overall survival (OS; p = 0.007). Furthermore, ctDNA load, defined by the number of mutant ctDNA molecules per mL plasma, significantly correlated with PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.001). Furthermore, mutational status of ESR1 and TP53 significantly predicted PFS (p = 0.024 and p = 0.035, respectively) and OS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.035, respectively). These results emphasizes the clinical value of ctDNA mutational analysis in the management of advanced breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival according to (a) mutation number (a) and (b) ctDNA load. Number of likely-pathogenic or pathogenic mutations was categorized as 0 mutations, 1–2 mutations, and ≥ 3 mutations. Number of mutant ctDNA molecules per mL plasma was used to assess ctDNA load, which was categorized into tertiles. No (zero) ctDNA load was defined by the first tertile, a low/medium ctDNA load was defined by the second tertile, and a high ctDNA load was defined by the third tertile of mutant ctDNA molecule concentration. P-values were obtained by Log-Rank-Mantel-Cox-tests. PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hazard ratios [95% confidence interval] of mutated genes for progression free survival and overall survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival according to (a, b) mutant ESR1 and (c, d) mutant TP53. P-values were obtained by Log-Rank-Mantel-Cox-tests. PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; CDK4/6i+ET, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harbeck N, Gnant M. Breast cancer. The Lancet. 2017;389:1134–1150. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31891-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turner NC, Neven P, Loibl S, Andre F. Advances in the treatment of advanced oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer. The Lancet. 2017;389:2403–2414. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32419-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rugo HS, et al. Endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: American society of clinical oncology guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34:3069–3103. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1487. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cardoso F, et al. 4th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 4) Ann. Oncol. 2018;29:1634–1657. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy192. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Venkatesan S, Swanton C, Taylor BS, Costello JF. Treatment-induced mutagenesis and selective pressures sculpt cancer evolution. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Med. 2017;7:a026617. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a026617. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types