Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 8:12:642634.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.642634. eCollection 2021.

Exploring the Dimensions of Smartphone Distraction: Development, Validation, Measurement Invariance, and Latent Mean Differences of the Smartphone Distraction Scale (SDS)

Affiliations

Exploring the Dimensions of Smartphone Distraction: Development, Validation, Measurement Invariance, and Latent Mean Differences of the Smartphone Distraction Scale (SDS)

Melina A Throuvala et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Distraction is a functional emotion regulation strategy utilized to relieve emotional distress. Within the attention economy perspective, distraction is increasingly associated with digital technology use, performance impairments and interference with higher-order cognitive processes. Research on smartphone distraction and its association with problematic smartphone use is still scarce and there is no available psychometric assessment tool to assess this cognitive and emotive process parsimoniously. Method: The present study reports the development and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Smartphone Distraction Scale (SDS) through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, construct validity, gender invariance, and latent mean differences. The study was conducted in a sample of British university students (N = 1,001; M = 21.10 years, SD = 2.77). Results: The 16-item SDS was best conceptualized in a four-factor model solution comprising attention impulsiveness, online vigilance, emotion regulation, and multitasking. Construct validity was established using relevant psychosocial and mental health measures, with SDS scores being moderately associated with deficient self-regulation and problematic social media use. Gender measurement invariance was achieved at the configural, metric, and scalar levels, and latent mean differences indicated that females had significantly higher means than males across all four SDS latent factors. Discussion: The SDS presents with several strengths, including its theoretical grounding, relatively short length, and sound psychometric properties. The SDS enables the assessment of distraction, which appears to be one of the pathways to problematic smartphone use facilitating overuse and overreliance on smartphones for emotion regulation processes. The assessment of distraction in relation to problematic use in vulnerable populations may facilitate interventions that could encourage metacognition and benefit these groups by allowing sustained productivity in an increasingly disrupted work and social environment.

Keywords: attention; distraction; smartphone distraction scale; smartphone use; social media use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Posner's attention model (53) adapted by Wu and Cheng (54) and further adapted for smartphone distraction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Smartphone distraction scale (SDS) four factor model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ashinoff BK, Abu-Akel A. Hyperfocus: the forgotten frontier of attention. Psychol Res. (2019) 85:1–19. 10.1007/s00426-019-01245-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: current status and future prospects. Psychol Inquiry. (2015) 26:1–26. 10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781 - DOI
    1. Mollenkopf D, Gaskill M, Nelson R, Debose CD. Navigating a new normal during the COVID-19 pandemic: college student perspectives of the shift to remote learning. Int J Technol Higher Educ. (2020) 17:67–79. 10.18162/ritpu-2020-v17n2-08 - DOI
    1. Delanoeije J, Verbruggen M. The use of work-home practices and work-home conflict: examining the role of volition and perceived pressure in a multi-method study. Front Psychol. (2019) 10:2362. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02362 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rigotti T, De Cuyper N, Sekiguchi T. The corona crisis: what can we learn from earlier studies in applied psychology? Appl Psychol. (2020) 69:1–6. 10.1111/apps.12265 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources