Why Do We Take Risks? Perception of the Situation and Risk Proneness Predict Domain-Specific Risk Taking
- PMID: 33762988
- PMCID: PMC7982407
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.562381
Why Do We Take Risks? Perception of the Situation and Risk Proneness Predict Domain-Specific Risk Taking
Abstract
Risk taking (RT) is a component of the decision-making process in situations that involve uncertainty and in which the probability of each outcome - rewards and/or negative consequences - is already known. The influence of cognitive and emotional processes in decision making may affect how risky situations are addressed. First, inaccurate assessments of situations may constitute a perceptual bias in decision making, which might influence RT. Second, there seems to be consensus that a proneness bias exists, known as risk proneness, which can be defined as the propensity to be attracted to potentially risky activities. In the present study, we take the approach that risk perception and risk proneness affect RT behaviours. The study hypothesises that locus of control, emotion regulation, and executive control act as perceptual biases in RT, and that personality, sensation seeking, and impulsivity traits act as proneness biases in RT. The results suggest that locus of control, emotion regulation and executive control influence certain domains of RT, while personality influences in all domains except the recreational, and sensation seeking and impulsivity are involved in all domains of RT. The results of the study constitute a foundation upon which to build in this research area and can contribute to the increased understanding of human behaviour in risky situations.
Keywords: emotion regulation; executive control; locus of control; personality; risk taking; sensation seeking impulsivity.
Copyright © 2021 de-Juan-Ripoll, Chicchi Giglioli, Llanes-Jurado, Marín-Morales and Alcañiz.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Sep;7(1):1-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x. Epub 2006 Sep 1. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006. PMID: 26158695
-
Boredom Proneness Predicts Self-Assessed Decision Errors in Sports but Is Unrelated to Risk Taking in General.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 15;19(6):3479. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063479. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35329163 Free PMC article.
-
Risk proneness modulates the impact of impulsivity on brain functional connectivity.Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Mar;41(4):943-951. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24851. Epub 2019 Nov 5. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020. PMID: 31691415 Free PMC article.
-
[Impulsivity and decision making in alcohol-addicted individuals].Psychiatr Pol. 2013 Mar-Apr;47(2):325-34. Psychiatr Pol. 2013. PMID: 23888765 Review. Polish.
-
Cognitive deficits in bipolar disorders: Implications for emotion.Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Feb;59:126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 21. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018. PMID: 29195773 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Biosafety: From a traditional approach to an integrated approach.Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 2;10:956623. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.956623. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35983353 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
How do online users perceive health risks during public health emergencies? Empirical evidence from China.Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 27;14:1087229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1087229. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36777227 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacists' perspectives and attitudes towards the 2021 down-scheduling of melatonin in Australia using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a mixed-methods study.Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Oct;45(5):1153-1166. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01605-w. Epub 2023 Jun 24. Int J Clin Pharm. 2023. PMID: 37354280 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Specific Psychological Characteristics on Decision-Making Under the Different Conditions of Risk Self-Assessment.Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 15;13:779246. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779246. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35369169 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Risk-taking in consumers' online purchases of health supplements and natural products: a grounded theory approach.J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Nov 3;16(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00645-x. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023. PMID: 37924079 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ahmed S. U. (1985). nAch, risk-taking propensity, locus of control and entrepreneurship. Pers. Individ. Differ. 6 781–782. 10.1016/0191-8869(85)90092-3 - DOI
-
- Appelt K. C., Milch K. F., Handgraaf M. J., Weber E. U. (2011). The decision making individual differences inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 6 252–262.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources