Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 10:11:07011.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.07011.

Significance of a social mobilization intervention for engaging communities in polio vaccination campaigns: Evidence from CORE Group Polio Project, Uttar Pradesh, India

Affiliations

Significance of a social mobilization intervention for engaging communities in polio vaccination campaigns: Evidence from CORE Group Polio Project, Uttar Pradesh, India

Manojkumar Choudhary et al. J Glob Health. .

Abstract

Background: Globally, community engagement is an integral part of most public health programs and the social mobilization (SM) intervention of India's polio eradication program is one such example that contributed to eliminating polio from the country. CORE Group Polio Project (CGPP), a partner of Uttar Pradesh (U.P.) SM Network executed its activities through a network of social mobilizers called Community Mobilization Coordinators (CMCs). These were deployed in polio high risk areas to perform awareness generation and trust-building activities with communities and achieved high coverage of polio vaccination during Supplementary Immunization Activity campaigns (SIAs). This paper measures the extent and outcomes of CMC community engagement in SM interventions and polio SIAs.

Methods: This study used secondary, cluster-level data from Management Information System of CGPP India, including 52 SIAs held between January 2008 to September 2017 in 56 blocks/polio planning units, covering 12 districts of U.P. We used five indicators that reflected community engagement in polio SIAs and constructed a Community Engagement Index (CEI). Further, we estimated the difference in the CEI between CMC and non-CMC areas, using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) and also estimated treatment effects through Difference-in-Differences (DID) method using STATA.

Results: Overall, 78.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 78.3, 78.8) of families from the study area were engaged in the polio SIAs and the extent of community engagement increased over time. The mean CEI of entire study period in CMC areas (85.8%; 95% CI = 85.6, 86.0) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than that of non-CMC areas (71.3%; 95% CI = 71.1, 71.5). Over time, the SM intervention led to at least 11 percentage points increase in the CEI of CMC areas with about 17% of this achievement attributable to CGPP India's SM efforts.

Conclusions: The study findings suggest that intensive social mobilization efforts can significantly increase the extent of community engagement. The community engagement learnings of polio SM Network may be useful to achieve the desired outcomes of public health programs such as the National Health Mission (NHM) of India, that serves communities for multiple health issues.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE Unified Competing Interest form (available upon request from the corresponding author) and declare no further conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Theoretical framework of community engagement in polio SIAs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean values of individual indices and unequally weighted Community Engagement Index by CMC-level intervention status, January 2008 to September 2017.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Trends in Community Engagement Index of polio SIAs by Intervention Status, January 2008 to September 2017. Each line represents the mean value for Community Engagement Index (CEI, presented as percentage of families that were engaged in the polio SIAs) of polio SIAs, during the entire study period. The mean value is calculated at the block level separately for CMC and non-CMC areas. The blue line and broken brown line represents to the CMC and non-CMC areas, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Curry DW, Perry HB, Tirmizi SN, Goldstein AL, Lynch MC.Assessing the effectiveness of house-to-house visits on routine oral polio immunization completion and tracking of defaulters. J Health Popul Nutr. 2014;32:356-66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lamstein S, Stillman T, Koniz-Booher P, Aakesson A, Collaiezzi B, Williams T, et al. Evidence of Effective Approaches to Social and Behavior Change Communication for Preventing and Reducing Stunting and Anemia: Report from a Systematic Literature Review. Arlington, VA, USA: USAID/Strengthening Partnerships, Results, and Innovations in Nutrition Globally (SPRING) Project; 2014. Available: https://www.spring-nutrition.org/sites/default/files/publications/series.... Accessed: 28 August 2020.
    1. Health Communication Capacity Collaborative. Effective Social and Behavior Change Communication. 2018. Available: https://healthcommcapacity.org/effective-social-and-behavior-change-comm.... Accessed: 28 August 2020.
    1. Saaka M, Aryee P, Kuganab-lem R, Ali M, Masahudu AR.The effect of social behavior change communication package on maternal knowledge in obstetric danger signs among mothers in East Mamprusi District of Ghana. Global Health. 2017;13:19. 10.1186/s12992-017-0243-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Mara-Eves A, Brunton G, Oliver S, Kavanagh J, Jamal F, Thomas J.The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:129. 10.1186/s12889-015-1352-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed