Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 11;6(3):760-761.
doi: 10.1080/23802359.2021.1878960.

Chloroplast genome of Gaura parviflora Douglas and its comparative analysis

Affiliations

Chloroplast genome of Gaura parviflora Douglas and its comparative analysis

Bin Zhang et al. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. .

Abstract

Gaura parviflora Douglas (Onagraceae) is an annual or perennial herbaceous plant from the prairie of North America. It has become a harmful exotic invading plant in China due to its strong adaptability, fast growth, massive propagation and reproduction. The complete chloroplast (cp) genome of G. parviflora was reported in this study. The size of the complete cp genome of G. parviflora is 161,318 bp in length, including a pair of inverted repeat (IR) regions of 27,402 bp, a large single-copy (LSC) region of 89,132 bp, and a small single-copy (SSC) region of 17,382 bp. A total of 130 genes were annotated, including 85 protein-coding genes, 37 tRNA genes, and 8 rRNA genes. Comparison of cp genomes of four species from Onagraceae indicated that Onagraceae cp genomes had high nucleotide diversity. In addition, a few highly variable regions of these cp genomes were also detected. The phylogenetic tree showed that G. parviflora is closely related to Oenothera. Thus, the chloroplast genome of G. parviflora can provide valuable genetic information for species identification and phylogenetic analysis.

Keywords: Gaura parviflora Douglas; chloroplast genome; comparative analysis; phylogenetic analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
ML phylogenetic tree based on a dataset of 70 chloroplast coding regions. The numbers beside the node show bootstrap support values.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen JR, Hoch PC, Raven PH, Boufford DE, Wagner WL.. 2007. Onagraceae. In Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hang DY, editors. Flora of China. Vol. 13. Beijing: Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press; p. 427.
    1. Dierckxsens N, Mardulyn P, Smits G.. 2017. NOVOPlasty: de novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 45(4):e18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL.. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemistry Bull. 19:11–15.
    1. Du WB, Ye YZ, Peng S.. 2003. Study on the seasonal growing dynamics and invasive characteristics of Gaura parviflora. Acta Ecol Sin. 23(8):1679–1684.
    1. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, et al. . 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 28(12):1647–1649. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources