Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;25(10):5889-5895.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03894-9. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

Evaluation of residual contamination on reused healing abutments

Affiliations

Evaluation of residual contamination on reused healing abutments

Sezgi Cinel Sahin et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate residual contamination of healing abutments sterilized by dealers of dental implant companies.

Material and methods: Healing abutments collected from dealers of different implant companies were randomly numbered, and they were examined for visible deformation and contamination on the abutment surface, packaging errors, and presence of a sterilization indicator. The healing abutments were stained with a dye solution for contamination detection and evaluated by dividing into different regions. The presence of residual contamination was examined through photographic images taken from the healing abutments and the data obtained were recorded. Pearson's chi-square analysis was used to evaluate the relation between implant brands and contamination status. Significance was evaluated as p <0.05.

Results: Visible residual contamination was detected in approximately 31% of the healing abutments. After the staining procedure, in the visual assessment of the stained surfaces, residual contamination was found in at least one region of all healing abutments except one (n=176, 99.4%). The most intense staining was seen in the screw driver hole (n=172, 97.1%), body (n=113, 63.8%), occlusal (n=107, 60.4%), screw (n=79, 44.6%), and connector (n=72, 40.6%) regions, respectively. A significant relationship was found between the brands and the contamination status (p <0.05).

Conclusion: The reuse of healing abutments is not suitable, as it does not ensure optimum cleaning and sterilization, and it is not possible to eliminate contaminants completely.

Clinical relevance: Despite the economic benefits of multiple use of healing abutments, disadvantages should be carefully evaluated by clinicians.

Keywords: Dental implant; Healing abutments; Residual contamination; Reuse; Sterilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chew M, Tompkins G, Tawse-Smith A, Waddell J, Ma S (2018) Reusing titanium healing abutments: comparison of two decontamination methods. Int J Prosthodont 31:613–618. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5881 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cakan U, Delilbasi C, Er S, Kivanc M (2015) Is it safe to reuse dental implant healing abutments sterilized and serviced by dealers of dental implant manufacturers? An in vitro sterility analysis. Implant Dent 24:174–179. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000198 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wadhwani C, Schonnenbaum TR, Audia F, Chung KH (2016) In-vitro study of the contamination remaining on used healing abutments after cleaning and sterilizing in dental practice. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 18:1069–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12385 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Canullo L, Genova T, Trujillo EG, Pradies G, Petrillo S, Muzzi M (2020) Fibroblast interaction with different abutment surfaces: in vitro study. Int J Mol Sci 21:1919. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21061919 - DOI - PMC
    1. Rees J (2012) Asepsis in implant dentistry. Prim Dent J 1:47–49. https://doi.org/10.1308/205016812803838348 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources